ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
The clinical effect of emergency gastroscopy on upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage patients.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of stress ulcers in critically ill patients (2026).Journal of intensive medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of Timing of Endoscopy on Mortality in Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Retrospective Cohort Study :.Galen medical journal · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of gastroscopic hemostasis in the treatment of acute gastric hemorrhage: A meta-analysis.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the clinical effects of emergency gastroscopies on acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage patients.
methods212 patients with acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhages were randomly divided into an experimental group (n=106) and a control group (n=106). The experimental group underwent emergency gastroscopies, and the control group underwent the traditional treatment. We measured the hemostasis effects, the treatment indexes, and the incidences of adverse reactions to assess the clinical effects. At the same time, we recorded the hemoglobin levels, the rebleeding rates, and the mortality rate to assess the hemostasis effect.
resultsThe hemostasis effect (the total hemostasis effective rate), the treatment index (the hemostasis time, stool occult blood turning negative time, bowel sound recovery time, and the blood transfusion volumes), the hemoglobin levels, the rebleeding rates, and the mortality were better in the EG than they were in the CG (P<0.05).
conclusionsEmergency gastroscopy is an effective treatment for acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage patients, because it improves the hemostasis effective rate and the survival rate. Clinical therapy effectively cures the hemorrhages in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34017528PMC8129367W3160943195What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.