ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Predictive nursing helps improve treatment efficacy, treatment compliance, and quality of life in unstable angina pectoris patients.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Experience and Needs of Immunotherapy for Lung Cancer Patients: A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies.Psycho-oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy of sacubitril-valsartan combined with rosuvastatin calcium in the treatment of unstable angina pectoris and its effects on blood lipids and hemorheology.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- The Effect of Humanistic Care Combined with Predictive Nursing on Negative Emotions and Incidence of Cardiovascular Events in Hemodialysis Patients.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis paper aims to explore the effects of predictive nursing on the treatment efficacy in unstable angina pectoris (UAP) patients and on their treatment compliance and quality of life (QOL).
methodsAdmitted to our hospital from November 2017 to August 2019, 110 UAP patients were recruited as the study cohort and randomized into a control group (CG) and an observation group (OG). Among them, 53 patients in the CG underwent routine nursing, and the remaining 57 patients in the OG underwent additional predictive nursing in addition to the routine nursing. The patients in both groups were observed with respect to their general data, the therapeutic effects after the nursing, their clinical indicators (length of hospital stays, stable states of angina pectoris, attacks of angina pectoris), their treatment compliance after the nursing, their negative emotions before and after the nursing, their adverse reactions during the nursing, and the changes in their blood pressure (diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure) and QOL indices after the nursing.
resultsThere were no differences in the general data between the two groups (P>0.05), but the clinical indicators were better in the OG (P<0.05). After the nursing, the treatment compliance and improvement of the negative emotions were better in the OG (P<0.05), and the efficacy was also better in this group (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions was lower in the OG (P<0.05), and the changes in the blood pressure indices were better in this group (P<0.05). After the nursing, the QOL in the OG was better (P<0.05).
conclusionPredictive nursing is conducive to improving the efficacy, the treatment compliance, and the QOL of UAP patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34017524PMC8129405W3162402755What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.