ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
The feasibility of using Hcy, CRP, and Cys-C to analyze AMI patients' disease conditions and prognoses.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Observational
- Biological use influences the impact of inflammation on risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in rheumatoid arthritis.RMD open · 2024Observational
- The Association Between S100A12 Protein and C-Reactive Protein with Malignant Ventricular Arrhythmias Following Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Elderly.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
- Clinical significance of carotid intima-media thickness and plasma homocysteine in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2023Article
- Correlation Between GDF11 Serum Levels, Severity of Coronary Artery Lesions, and the Prognosis of Patients with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study was conducted to investigate the feasibility of using the serum homocysteine (Hcy), C-reactive protein (CRP), and cystatin C (Cys-C) levels to evaluate the conditions and prognoses of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients.
methodsOne hundred and twenty patients with AMI were enrolled as an observation group (the AMI group). Eighty patients with stable angina pectoris were included in a control group (the SA group). Eighty healthy volunteers were enrolled as a healthy control group (the NCHD group). The AMI patients were divided into groups of >20 (n = 32), 10-20 (n = 45) and <10 (n = 43) according to their APACHE-II scores. The groups were divided into a death group (n = 23) and a survival group (n = 97) according to the patients' 1-year follow-up outcomes. The differences in the serum Hcy, CRP, and Cys-C levels among the different groups, and the correlations between the serum levels were calculated.
resultsThe serum Hcy, CRP, and Cys-C levels in the AMI group were significantly higher than they were in the SA and NCHD groups (
conclusionSerum Hcy, CRP, and Cys-C levels can reflect the severity of the patients' conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34017434PMC8129397What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.