ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Effect of multimodal analgesia on gynecological cancer patients after radical resection.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Postoperative Pain Following Gynecology Oncological Surgery: A Systematic Review by Tumor Site.Cancers · 2025Review
- Multimodal Analgesia and Outcomes in Hysterectomy Surgery-A Population-Based Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The Effect of Thai Massage on the Severity of Pain in Patients with Unstable Angina: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.Journal of caring sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis research was designed to probe into the effect of multimodal analgesia on gynecological cancer patients after radical resection.
methodsNinety-eight cervical cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection in our hospital were included. Thereinto, 47 in the research group (RG) were given multimodal analgesia, and 51 in the control group (CG) were given conventional postoperative analgesia. The time of operation, anesthesia recovery room observation and extubation, postoperative NRS pain score, and the clinical manifestations of both groups were observed. The activity within three days after operation, the incidence of postoperative complications, hospitalization time and quality of life of both groups were compared.
resultsThe operation time of the RG was higher than that of the CG (P < 0.05), and the time of observation and extubation in the anesthesia room were lower than those in the CG (P < 0.05); the NRS pain score was lower than that of the CG (P < 0.05); the first time to get out of bed, and time of exhaust and diet were shorter than those of the CG (P < 0.05); the activity was better than that of the CG within three days after operation (P < 0.05); the incidence of complications was markedly lower than that in the CG (P < 0.05); the hospitalization time was shorter than that of the CG (P < 0.05); the postoperative quality of life was shorter than that in the CG (P < 0.05).
conclusionMultimodal analgesia is safe and effective for patients after laparoscopic radical resection of gynecological malignancies, which can speed up the recovery of diseases and improve the quality of life. Thus, it is worthy of clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34017429PMC8129368W3161539844What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.