Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34017404›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of translational research2021

Comparing laparoscopy and laparotomy procedures in the radical hysterectomy surgery for endometrial cancer: a basic review.

Shadi Haddad, Keyvan Ghadimi, Ranna Abrishamkar, Nazli Sadat Meshinchi Asl

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Racioethnic Disparities in Endometrial Cancer Outcomes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effect of aminophylline, ketamine and paracetamol on pain intensity after deep vitrectomy surgery.International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  10. Evaluating the preventive effect of metoclopramide and aminophylline on pain after deep vitrectomy.International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Comparison of diagnostic values of two magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols for diagnosis of breast lesions.International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  14. A literature review on the imaging methods for breast cancer.International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  15. Mechanism and adverse effects of COVID-19 drugs: a basic review.International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Treatment of pilon fractures with low profile plates.International journal of burns and trauma · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shadi HaddadNajafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University Najafabad, Isfahan, Iran.
Keyvan GhadimiDepartment of Research, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Cancer Center Isfahan, Iran.
Ranna AbrishamkarNajafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University Najafabad, Isfahan, Iran.
Nazli Sadat Meshinchi AslPost-doc Research Position at Baylor College of Medicine Huston, Texas, USA.
Islamic Azad University of Najafabad · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gynecological cancers especially endometrial cancer have put a huge burden on health care systems in different societies. In this regard, different studies have evaluated screening, diagnosis and treatments of endometrial cancer. Different survival rates, prognosis and recurrence rates have been reported by variable treatment methods. Laparotomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (RH and LRH) are nowadays two most common surgical methods for endometrial cancer. In this systematic review, we investigated all article comparing two treatment techniques regarding RH and LRH in women with endometrial cancer who were classified as International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I to III. Data regarding to blood loss and transfusion rate, operative time, duration of hospital stay, complications as intraoperative and postoperative, mean nodules counts, recurrent rate, adjuvant therapy were collected and analyzed. After reviewing five cohort studies, we indicated that laparoscopic procedures were better than laparotomy for managing endometrial cancer because the duration of hospitalization, blood loss and intraoperative and postoperative complications in laparoscopy procedure were lower than laparotomy procedures.

Indexed as

Endometrial cancerlaparoscopylaparotomy

Identifiers

PMID34017404
PMCPMC8129313
OpenAlexW3161674598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.