ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for patients with lung adenocarcinoma based on a novel 6-DNA repair-related gene signature.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- A long-term survival prediction model for non-small cell lung cancer based on blood inflammatory biomarkers.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Phosphoserine phosphatase as a prognostic biomarker in patients with gastric cancer and its potential association with immune cells.BMC gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Immune Landscape and Classification in Lung Adenocarcinoma Based on a Novel Cell Cycle Checkpoints Related Signature for Predicting Prognosis and Therapeutic Response.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA repair-related genes (DRGs) have attracted much attention in the field of oncology. However, the prognostic role of DRGs and their biological function in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) remains rudimentary and inconclusive. In this study, 716 LUAD cases from two different cohorts were collected. Samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were used as the training set, and data from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets were used for validation. Using multivariate Cox analysis and LASSO regression, we constructed a DRG signature and used it, together with clinical indices, to develop a nomogram to predict 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates. We identified a six-DRG signature to estimate the survival of LUAD patients, which distinguished high-risk from low-risk patients with LUAD in both the training and validation cohorts. We also observed elevated levels of infiltrating CD4 memory activated T cells, resting NK cells, M0 and M1 macrophages, and activated mast cells in the high-risk group. Finally, a nomogram incorporating the signature and clinical parameters was superior to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system in predicting the survival of LUAD patients. The DRG prognostic signature and integrated nomogram could be a useful tool to predict prognosis in patients with LUAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34017369PMC8129254W3161606787What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.