Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34017234›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2021

Conflict Test Battery for Studying the Act of Facing Threats in Pursuit of Rewards.

Elizabeth Illescas-Huerta, Leticia Ramirez-Lugo, Rodrigo O Sierra, Jorge A Quillfeldt, Francisco Sotres-Bayon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Dual Role of LH-GABA Neurons in Encoding Alcohol Reward and Aversive Memories.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Ventral Pallidum and Amygdala Cooperate to Restrain Reward Approach under Threat.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Stress, associative learning, and decision-making.Neurobiology of learning and memory · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elizabeth Illescas-HuertaCell Physiology Institute-Neuroscience, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.
Leticia Ramirez-LugoCell Physiology Institute-Neuroscience, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.
Rodrigo O SierraDepartment of Physiology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Jorge A QuillfeldtDepartment of Biophysics, Biosciences Institute, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Francisco Sotres-BayonCell Physiology Institute-Neuroscience, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Survival depends on the ability of animals to avoid threats and approach rewards. Traditionally, these two opposing motivational systems have been studied separately. In nature, however, they regularly compete for the control of behavior. When threat- and reward-eliciting stimuli (learned or unlearned) occur simultaneously, a motivational conflict emerges that challenges individuals to weigh available options and execute a single behavioral response (avoid or approach). Most previous animal models using approach/avoidance conflicts have often focused on the ability to avoid threats by forgoing or delaying the opportunity to obtain rewards. In contrast, behavioral tasks designed to capitalize on the ability to actively choose to execute approach behaviors despite threats are scarce. Thus, we developed a behavioral test battery composed of three conflict tasks to directly study rats confronting threats to obtain rewards guided by innate and conditioned cues. One conflict task involves crossing a potentially electrified grid to obtain food on the opposite end of a straight alley, the second task is based on the step-down threat avoidance paradigm, and the third one is a modified version of the open field test. We used diazepam to pharmacologically validate conflict behaviors in our tasks. We found that, regardless of whether competing stimuli were conditioned or innate, a low diazepam dose decreased risk assessment and facilitated taking action to obtain rewards in the face of threats during conflict, without affecting choice behavior when there was no conflict involved. Using this pharmacologically validated test battery of ethologically designed innate/learned conflict tasks could help understand the fundamental brain mechanisms underlying the ability to confront threats to achieve goals.

Indexed as

accumbensamygdalaapproach-avoidancechoicedecision-makingfearprefrontal

Identifiers

PMID34017234
PMCPMC8129192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.