Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34017163›Full record

ArticleMeasurement in physical education and exercise science2021

A Tutorial of Bland Altman Analysis in A Bayesian Framework.

Krissina M Alari, Steven B Kim, Jeffrey O Wand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Measurement in physical education and exercise science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Krissina M AlariDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, California State University, Monterey Bay, Seaside, California, USA.
Steven B KimDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, California State University, Monterey Bay, Seaside, California, USA.
Jeffrey O WandDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, California State University, Monterey Bay, Seaside, California, USA.

Funding

Innovative Research Education and Articulation in the Preparation of Under-represented and First Generation Students for Careers in Biomedical Big Data ScienceR25MD010391 · NIMHD · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIV, MONTEREY BAY · PI CANNER, JUDITH ELENA · 2015 to 2019
$1.0M
NIMHD NIH HHS R25 MD010391
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are two schools of thought in statistical analysis, frequentist, and Bayesian. Though the two approaches produce similar estimations and predictions in large-sample studies, their interpretations are different. Bland Altman analysis is a statistical method that is widely used for comparing two methods of measurement. It was originally proposed under a frequentist framework, and it has not been used under a Bayesian framework despite the growing popularity of Bayesian analysis. It seems that the mathematical and computational complexity narrows access to Bayesian Bland Altman analysis. In this article, we provide a tutorial of Bayesian Bland Altman analysis. One approach we suggest is to address the objective of Bland Altman analysis via the posterior predictive distribution. We can estimate the probability of an acceptable degree of disagreement (fixed

Indexed as

Bayesian inferenceBland Altman analysisinformative priorposterior predictive distributionreliability study

Identifiers

PMID34017163
PMCPMC8133695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.