Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34017154›Full record

ArticleProfessional psychology, research and practice2020

Pilot Study of an Online Parent-Training Course for Disruptive Behavior with Live Remote Coaching for Practitioners.

Camilo Ortiz, Hilary Vidair, Mary Acri, Anil Chacko, Kenneth Kobak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Professional psychology, research and practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Camilo OrtizLong Island University-Post.
Hilary VidairLong Island University-Post.
Mary AcriNew York University.
Anil ChackoNew York University.
Kenneth KobakCenter for Telepsychology.

Funding

New Technologies for Therapist Training and Patient Engagement in Behavioral Parent TrainingR43MH110279 · NIMH · CENTER FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL CONSULTATION · PI KOBAK, KENNETH A · 2017 to 2018
$457k
NIMH NIH HHS R43 MH110279
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMany clinicians find it challenging to obtain training in evidence-based interventions, including behavioral parent training, which is considered the front-line treatment for children with disruptive behaviors (Chacko et al., 2017). Workshops, ongoing consultation, and feedback provided in person are effective, yet are rarely feasible for clinicians in the field (Fixsen, Blase, Duda, Naoom, & Van Dyke, 2010). The purpose of the present study was to conduct a preliminary assessment of an online tutorial combined with live remote coaching for training mental health professionals in behavioral parent training.

methodParticipants in this pretest-posttest open trial were 22 clinicians and graduate students (73% female) from around the United States.

resultsThe web platform operated successfully, and clinicians found the training to be highly satisfactory. Compared to pre-training, participants demonstrated large improvements in knowledge about disruptive behavior and behavioral parent training and performed significantly better on demonstrations of skill in administering behavioral parent-training components.

conclusionsAn online course combined with live remote coaching is a promising methodology for significantly increasing the number of clinicians trained in evidence-based interventions for disruptive behavior in children. Next steps for evaluation and expansion of this training model are discussed.

Indexed as

Behavioral Parent TrainingDisruptive BehaviorDisseminationEvidence BasedOnlineTraining

Identifiers

PMID34017154
PMCPMC8132613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.