Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34017148›Full record

ArticleLand economics2020

An Integrated Assessment Model for Valuing Water Quality Changes in the U.S.

Joel Corona, Todd Doley, Charles Griffiths, Matthew Massey, Chris Moore, Stephen Muela, Brenda Rashleigh, William Wheeler, Stephen D Whitlock, Julie Hewitt

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Land economics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Getting off the ladder: Disentangling water quality indices to enhance the valuation of divergent ecosystem services.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  3. Estimating biotic integrity to capture existence value of freshwater ecosystems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  4. Measuring the social benefits of water quality improvements to support regulatory objectives: Progress and future directions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  5. Valuing water quality in the United States using a national dataset on property values.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joel CoronaUnited States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), Office of Water, Washington, District of Columbia.
Todd DoleyUS EPA, Office of Water, Washington, District of Columbia.
Charles GriffithsUS EPA, National Center for Environmental Economics, Washington, District of Columbia.
Matthew MasseyUS EPA, National Center for Environmental Economics, Washington, District of Columbia.
Chris MooreUS EPA, National Center for Environmental Economics, Washington, District of Columbia.
Stephen MuelaOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) with US EPA Office of Water, Washington, District of Columbia.
Brenda RashleighUS EPA, Office of Research and Development, Narragansett, Rhode Island.
William WheelerUS EPA, National Center for Environmental Economics, Washington, District of Columbia.
Stephen D WhitlockUnited States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), Office of Water, Washington, District of Columbia.
Julie HewittUnited States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), Office of Water, Washington, District of Columbia.
Environmental Protection Agency · US

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) often requires expertise from environmental assessors, hydrologists, economists, and others to analyze the benefits of regional and national policy decisions related to changes in water quality. This led EPA to develop two models to form an Integrated Assessment Model (IAM): HAWQS is a web-based water quantity and quality modeling systems and BenSPLASH is a modeling platform for quantifying the economic benefits of changes in water quality. This paper discusses the development of the component models and applies HAWQS and BenSPLASH to a case study in the Republican River Basin.

Indexed as

Economic ValuationIntegrated Assessment ModelWater Quality

Identifiers

PMID34017148
PMCPMC8128698
OpenAlexW3114399453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.