Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34017097›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2021

Aesthetic preference for art can be predicted from a mixture of low- and high-level visual features.

Kiyohito Iigaya, Sanghyun Yi, Iman A Wahle, Koranis Tanwisuth, John P O'Doherty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Unveiling the factors of aesthetic preferences with explainable AI.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kiyohito IigayaDivision of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA. kiigaya@caltech.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4748-8432
Sanghyun YiDivision of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1274-6523
Iman A WahleDivision of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Koranis TanwisuthDivision of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3563-6781
John P O'DohertyDivision of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.

Funding

The Neurobiology of Social Decision-Making: Social Inference and ContextP50MH094258 · NIMH · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI O'DOHERTY, JOHN P · 2012 to 2021
$18.6M
Determining the neural substrates of model-based and model-free reinforcement-learning during Pavlovian conditioning (Minority Supplement)R01DA040011 · NIDA · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI O'DOHERTY, JOHN P · 2016 to 2020
$2.6M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA040011NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH094258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is an open question whether preferences for visual art can be lawfully predicted from the basic constituent elements of a visual image. Here, we developed and tested a computational framework to investigate how aesthetic values are formed. We show that it is possible to explain human preferences for a visual art piece based on a mixture of low- and high-level features of the image. Subjective value ratings could be predicted not only within but also across individuals, using a regression model with a common set of interpretable features. We also show that the features predicting aesthetic preference can emerge hierarchically within a deep convolutional neural network trained only for object recognition. Our findings suggest that human preferences for art can be explained at least in part as a systematic integration over the underlying visual features of an image.

Indexed as

ArtChoice BehaviorEstheticsNeural Networks, ComputerAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPhotic StimulationVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34017097
PMCPMC8494016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.