Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34017094›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2021

Mutational signatures impact the evolution of anti-EGFR antibody resistance in colorectal cancer.

Andrew Woolston, Louise J Barber, Beatrice Griffiths, Oriol Pich, Nuria Lopez-Bigas, Nik Matthews, Sheela Rao, David Watkins, Ian Chau, Naureen Starling and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Survival outcome prediction of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients based on radiomics and mutation signature.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Bispecific antibody drug conjugates: Making 1+1>2.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Circulating Tumor DNA to Drive Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Review
  17. Mutation bias and the predictability of evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Resistance Mechanisms to Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Therapy inJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrew WoolstonTranslational Oncogenomics Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6175-4805
Louise J BarberTranslational Oncogenomics Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Beatrice GriffithsTranslational Oncogenomics Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Oriol PichInstitute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain.
Nuria Lopez-BigasInstitute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain.
Nik MatthewsTumour Profiling Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Sheela RaoGastrointestinal Cancer Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
David WatkinsGastrointestinal Cancer Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Ian ChauGastrointestinal Cancer Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Naureen StarlingGastrointestinal Cancer Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
David CunninghamGastrointestinal Cancer Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5158-1069
Marco GerlingerTranslational Oncogenomics Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK. marco.gerlinger@icr.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2719-299X
Institute of Cancer Research · GBRoyal Marsden Hospital · GBInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ESInstitute for Research in Biomedicine · ES

Funding

Department of HealthEuropean Research Council 820137
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anti-EGFR antibodies such as cetuximab are active against KRAS/NRAS wild-type colorectal cancers (CRCs), but acquired resistance invariably evolves. It is unknown which mutational mechanisms enable resistance evolution and whether adaptive mutagenesis (a transient cetuximab-induced increase in mutation generation) contributes in patients. Here, we investigate these questions in exome sequencing data from 42 baseline and progression biopsies from cetuximab-treated CRCs. Mutation loads did not increase from baseline to progression, and evidence for a contribution of adaptive mutagenesis was limited. However, the chemotherapy-induced mutational signature SBS17b was the main contributor of specific KRAS/NRAS and EGFR driver mutations that are enriched at acquired resistance. Detectable SBS17b activity before treatment predicted shorter progression-free survival and the evolution of these specific mutations during subsequent cetuximab treatment. This result suggests that chemotherapy mutagenesis can accelerate resistance evolution. Mutational signatures may be a new class of cancer evolution predictor.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalColorectal NeoplasmsCetuximabHumansMutationAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCetuximab

Identifiers

PMID34017094
PMCPMC7611134
OpenAlexW3162617742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.