ArticleThe ISME journal2021
Population differentiation of Rhodobacteraceae along with coral compartments.
Article in The ISME journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Decoding coral resistance to eutrophication through the association of hyper‑efficient denitrifiers as key microbial allies.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Global genomics of Lactococcus lactis: horizontal gene transfer and intergenic variation drive multiple domestication and dairy adaptation.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- Structural Dynamics of the Skin-Associated Microbiome of the Sea Cucumber Holothuria scabra During Integument Ulceration and Recovery.Current microbiology · 2025Article
- Organ structure and bacterial microbiogeography in a reproductive organ of the Hawaiian bobtail squid reveal dimensions of a defensive symbiosis.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Phototrophic bacteria as potential probiotics for corals.npj biodiversity · 2025Review
- Genomic characteristics and phylogenetic relationships of Cutibacterium acnes breast milk isolates.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Photosynthetic dependence and filament production in physical bacterial-Symbiodiniaceae interactions.ISME communications · 2025Article
- Horizontal transmission of symbiotic bacteria and host selective sweep in the giant clamISME communications · 2025Article
- The coral microbiome in sickness, in health and in a changing world.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2024Review
- Probiotics reshape the coral microbiome in situ without detectable off-target effects in the surrounding environment.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Comparative genomic insights into habitat adaptation of coral-associatedFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Community Structure and Predicted Functions of Actively Growing Bacteria Responsive to Released Coral Mucus in Surrounding Seawater.Microbes and environments · 2023Article
- Red Sea Atlas of Coral-Associated Bacteria Highlights Common Microbiome Members and Their Distribution across Environmental Gradients-A Systematic Review.Microorganisms · 2022Review
- Millennia-old coral holobiont DNA provides insight into future adaptive trajectories.Molecular ecology · 2022Article
- Article
- Metagenomic shifts in mucus, tissue and skeleton of the coral Balanophyllia europaea living along a natural COISME communications · 2022Article
- Nutrient Enrichment Predominantly Affects Low Diversity Microbiomes in a Marine Trophic Symbiosis between Algal Farming Fish and Corals.Microorganisms · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coral mucus, tissue, and skeleton harbor compositionally different microbiota, but how these coral compartments shape the microbial evolution remains unexplored. Here, we sampled bacteria inhabiting a prevalent coral species Platygyra acuta and sequenced genomes of 234 isolates comprising two populations in Rhodobacteraceae, an alphaproteobacterial lineage representing a significant but variable proportion (5-50%) of the coral microbiota. The Ruegeria population (20 genomes) contains three clades represented by eight, six, and six isolates predominantly sampled from the skeleton (outgroup), mucus (clade-M), and skeleton (clade-S), respectively. The clade-M possesses functions involved in the utilization of coral osmolytes abundant in the mucus (e.g., methylamines, DMSP, taurine, and L-proline), whereas the clade-S uniquely harbors traits that may promote adaptation to the low-energy and diurnally anoxic skeleton (e.g., sulfur oxidation and swimming motility). These between-clade genetic differences were largely supported by physiological assays. Expanded analyses by including genomes of 24 related isolates (including seven new genomes) from other marine environments suggest that clade-M and clade-S may have diversified in non-coral habitats, but they also consolidated a key role of distinct coral compartments in diversifying many of the above-mentioned traits. The unassigned Rhodobacteraceae population (214 genomes) varies only at a few dozen nucleotide sites across the whole genomes, but the number of between-compartment migration events predicted by the Slatkin-Maddison test supported that dispersal limitation between coral compartments is another key mechanism diversifying microbial populations. Collectively, our results suggest that different coral compartments represent ecologically distinct and microgeographically separate habitats that drive the evolution of the coral microbiota.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.