Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34016999›Full record

ArticleNPJ primary care respiratory medicine2021

Cost-effectiveness analysis of COPD screening programs in primary care for high-risk patients in China.

Shuli Qu, Xuedan You, Tianyi Liu, Lijiao Wang, Zheng Yin, Yanjun Liu, Chong Ye, Ting Yang, Mao Huang, Hongchao Li and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Shuli QuReal-World Insights, IQVIA, Beijing, China.
Xuedan YouMedical Affairs, AstraZeneca, Beijing, China.
Tianyi LiuMedical Affairs, AstraZeneca, Beijing, China.
Lijiao WangMedical Affairs, AstraZeneca, Beijing, China.
Zheng YinReal-World Insights, IQVIA, Beijing, China.
Yanjun LiuReal-World Insights, IQVIA, Beijing, China.
Chong YeReal-World Insights, IQVIA, Beijing, China.
Ting YangNational Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases; Institute of Respiratory Medicine Chinese Academy of Medical Science; Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Mao HuangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Hongchao LiDepartment of Health Economics, School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Liwen FangNational Center for Chronic and Non-Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Jinping ZhengNational Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China. jpzhenggy@163.com.
China Pharmaceutical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CNInstitute of Occupational Medicine · GBNanjing Medical University · CNNational Center for Chronic and Noncommunicable Disease Control and Prevention · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We built a decision-analytic model to compare the cost-effectiveness of using portable spirometer and questionnaire to screen chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD) with no screening (i.e. usual care) among chronic bronchitis patient in China. A lifetime horizon and a payer perspective were adopted. Cost data of health services including spirometry screening and treatment costs covered both maintenance and exacerbation. The result indicated that portable spirometer screening was cost-saving compared with questionnaire screening and no screening, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of -5026 and -1766 per QALY, respectively. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. In summary, portable spirometer screening is likely the optimal option for COPD screening among chronic bronchitis patients China.

Indexed as

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveCost-Benefit AnalysisHealth Care CostsHumansMass ScreeningPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID34016999
PMCPMC8137942
OpenAlexW3160203369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.