Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34016968›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Continent-wide genomic signatures of adaptation to urbanisation in a songbird across Europe.

Pablo Salmón, Arne Jacobs, Dag Ahrén, Clotilde Biard, Niels J Dingemanse, Davide M Dominoni, Barbara Helm, Max Lundberg, Juan Carlos Senar, Philipp Sprau and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Pablo Salmón *Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. pablo.salmon.saro@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9718-6611
Arne Jacobs *Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7635-5447
Dag AhrénDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Clotilde BiardSorbonne Université, UPEC, Paris 7, CNRS, INRA, IRD, Institut d'Écologie et des Sciences de l'Environnement de Paris, iEES Paris, F-75005, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7474-5345
Niels J DingemanseDepartment of Biology, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3320-0861
Davide M DominoniInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2063-9955
Barbara HelmInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6648-1463
Max LundbergDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Juan Carlos SenarMuseu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9955-3892
Philipp SprauDepartment of Biology, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Marcel E VisserDepartment of Animal Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1456-1939
Caroline IsakssonDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. Caroline.Isaksson@biol.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6889-1386
Lund University · SEUniversity of Glasgow · GBCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMuseu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona · ESNetherlands Institute of Ecology · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urbanisation is increasing worldwide, and there is now ample evidence of phenotypic changes in wild organisms in response to this novel environment. Yet, the genetic changes and genomic architecture underlying these adaptations are poorly understood. Here, we genotype 192 great tits (Parus major) from nine European cities, each paired with an adjacent rural site, to address this major knowledge gap in our understanding of wildlife urban adaptation. We find that a combination of polygenic allele frequency shifts and recurrent selective sweeps are associated with the adaptation of great tits to urban environments. While haplotypes under selection are rarely shared across urban populations, selective sweeps occur within the same genes, mostly linked to neural function and development. Collectively, we show that urban adaptation in a widespread songbird occurs through unique and shared selective sweeps in a core-set of behaviour-linked genes.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularSelection, GeneticUrbanizationAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimal DistributionAnimalsCitiesEuropeGene FrequencyPasseriformes

Identifiers

PMID34016968
PMCPMC8137928
OpenAlexW3163711883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.