Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34016953›Full record

ArticleBDJ open2021

The efficacy of an extraoral scavenging device on reducing aerosol particles ≤ 5 µm during dental aerosol-generating procedures: an exploratory pilot study in a university setting.

Christian Graetz, Paulina Düffert, Ralf Heidenreich, Miriam Seidel, Christof E Dörfer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BDJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christian GraetzClinic of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany. graetz@konspar.uni-kiel.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8316-0565
Paulina DüffertClinic of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Ralf HeidenreichInstitute of Air Handling and Refrigeration, Dresden, Germany.
Miriam SeidelClinic of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Christof E DörferClinic of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVE/

aimTo identify small particle concentrations (eight categories: ≤0.1 µm × ≤5.0 µm) induced by aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs; high-speed tooth preparation, ultrasonic scaling; air polishing) under high-flow suction with a 16-mm intraoral cannula with and without an additional mobile extraoral scavenger (EOS) device during student training. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwenty tests were performed (16.94 m

resultsMean ΔPN (SD) ranged between -8.65E+06 (2.86E+07) counts/m DISCUSSION: A greater reduction in the number of smaller particles generated by the EOS device was found for high-speed tooth preparation. Low ΔPN by all AGPs demonstrated the efficacy of high-flow suction.

conclusionsThe additional use of an EOS device should be carefully considered when performing treatments, such as high-speed tooth preparation, that generate particularly small particles when more people are present and all other protective options have been exhausted.

Identifiers

PMID34016953
PMCPMC8134965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.