Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34016578›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2021

When technology precedes regulation: the challenges and opportunities of e-pharmacy in low-income and middle-income countries.

Rosalind Miller, Francis Wafula, Chima A Onoka, Prasanna Saligram, Anita Musiega, Dosila Ogira, Ikedichi Okpani, Ufuoma Ejughemre, Shrutika Murthy, Surekha Garimella and 8 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Rosalind MillerDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK rosalind.miller@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3161-127X
Francis WafulaInstitute of Healthcare Management, Strathmore University, Strathmore Business School, Nairobi, Kenya.
Chima A OnokaDepartment of Community Medicine, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.
Prasanna SaligramThe George Institute for Global Health India, New Delhi, India.
Anita MusiegaInstitute of Healthcare Management, Strathmore University, Strathmore Business School, Nairobi, Kenya.
Dosila OgiraInstitute of Healthcare Management, Strathmore University, Strathmore Business School, Nairobi, Kenya.
Ikedichi OkpaniNational Primary Healthcare Development Agency, Abuja, Nigeria.
Ufuoma EjughemreDelta State Government, Asaba, Nigeria.
Shrutika MurthyThe George Institute for Global Health India, New Delhi, India.
Surekha GarimellaThe George Institute for Global Health India, New Delhi, India.
Marie SandersonDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Stefanie EtteltDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Pauline AllenDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Devaki NambiarThe George Institute for Global Health India, New Delhi, India.
Abdul SalamThe George Institute for Global Health India, New Delhi, India.
Emmanuel Kweyu@iLabAfrica, Strathmore University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Kara HansonDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Catherine GoodmanDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent growth of medicine sales online represents a major disruption to pharmacy markets, with COVID-19 encouraging this trend further. While e-pharmacy businesses were initially the preserve of high-income countries, in the past decade they have been growing rapidly in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Public health concerns associated with e-pharmacy include the sale of prescription-only medicines without a prescription and the sale of substandard and falsified medicines. There are also non-health-related risks such as consumer fraud and lack of data privacy. However, e-pharmacy may also have the potential to improve access to medicines. Drawing on existing literature and a set of key informant interviews in Kenya, Nigeria and India, we examine the e-pharmacy regulatory systems in LMICs. None of the study countries had yet enacted a regulatory framework specific to e-pharmacy. Key regulatory challenges included the lack of consensus on regulatory models, lack of regulatory capacity, regulating sales across borders and risks of over-regulation. However, e-pharmacy also presents opportunities to enhance medicine regulation-through consolidation in the sector, and the traceability and transparency that online records offer. The regulatory process needs to be adapted to keep pace with this dynamic landscape and exploit these possibilities. This will require exploration of a range of innovative regulatory options, collaboration with larger, more compliant businesses, and engagement with global regulatory bodies. A key first step must be ensuring that national regulators are equipped with the necessary awareness and technical expertise to actively oversee this e-pharmacy activity.

Indexed as

Global HealthPharmaceutical ServicesPharmacyTechnologyCOVID-19HumansIndiaKenyaLegislation, DrugNigeriaPharmaciesSARS-CoV-2health policyhealth systemspublic healthqualitative study

Identifiers

PMID34016578
PMCPMC8141442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.