Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34016135›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2021

MichiGAN: sampling from disentangled representations of single-cell data using generative adversarial networks.

Hengshi Yu, Joshua D Welch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. BuDDI:bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. In-silico generation of high-dimensional immune response data in patients using a deep neural network.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hengshi YuDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Joshua D WelchDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA. welchjd@umich.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5869-2391

Funding

Quantitative definition of cell identity from single-cell multi-omic, spatial, and perturbation dataR01HG010883 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Joshua Welch · 2019 to 2026
$4.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep generative models such as variational autoencoders (VAEs) and generative adversarial networks (GANs) generate and manipulate high-dimensional images. We systematically assess the complementary strengths and weaknesses of these models on single-cell gene expression data. We also develop MichiGAN, a novel neural network that combines the strengths of VAEs and GANs to sample from disentangled representations without sacrificing data generation quality. We learn disentangled representations of three large single-cell RNA-seq datasets and use MichiGAN to sample from these representations. MichiGAN allows us to manipulate semantically distinct aspects of cellular identity and predict single-cell gene expression response to drug treatment.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsNeural Networks, ComputerSingle-Cell AnalysisComputer SimulationGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationHumansRNA-SeqStatistics, NonparametricCellular identityDisentangled representationsGenerative adversarial networksRepresentation learningSingle-cell genomics

Identifiers

PMID34016135
PMCPMC8139054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.