Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34016113›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Development and psychometric properties of surveys to assess provider perspectives on the barriers and facilitators of effective care transitions.

Maurice C Johnson, Helen Liu, Joann Sorra, Jane Brock, Brianna Gass, Jing Li, Jessica Miller Clouser, Karen Hirschman, Deborah Carpenter, Huong Q Nguyen and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Maurice C JohnsonWestat, 1600 Research Boulevard, Rockville, MD, USA. mauricejohnson@westat.com.
Helen LiuWestat, 1600 Research Boulevard, Rockville, MD, USA.
Joann SorraWestat, 1600 Research Boulevard, Rockville, MD, USA.
Jane BrockTelligen Quality Improvement Organization, Denver, CO, USA.
Brianna GassTelligen Quality Improvement Organization, Denver, CO, USA.
Jing LiCenter for Health Services Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Jessica Miller ClouserCenter for Health Services Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Karen HirschmanUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Deborah CarpenterWestat, 1600 Research Boulevard, Rockville, MD, USA.
Huong Q NguyenKaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Mark V WilliamsCenter for Health Services Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Westat (United States) · USUniversity of Kentucky · USImprovement Service · GBKaiser Permanente · USTelligen · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe quality of the discharge process and effective care transitions between settings of care are critical to minimize gaps in patient care and reduce hospital readmissions. Few studies have explored which care transition components and strategies are most valuable to patients and providers. This study describes the development, pilot testing, and psychometric analysis of surveys designed to gain providers' perspectives on current practices in delivering transitional care services.

methodsWe underwent a comprehensive process to develop items measuring unique aspects of care transitions from the perspectives of the three types of providers (downstream, ambulatory, and hospital providers). The process involved 1) an environmental scan, 2) provider interviews, 3) survey cognitive testing, 4) pilot testing, 5) a Stakeholder Advisory Group, 6) a Scientific Advisory Council, and 7) a collaborative Project ACHIEVE (Achieving Patient-Centered Care and Optimized Health in Care Transitions by Evaluating the Value of Evidence) research team. Three surveys were developed and fielded to providers affiliated with 43 hospitals participating in Project ACHIEVE. Web-based survey administration resulted in 948 provider respondents. We assessed response variability and response missingness. To evaluate the composites' psychometric properties, we examined intercorrelations of survey items, item factor loadings, model fit indices, internal consistency reliability, and intercorrelations between the composite measures and overall rating items.

resultsResults from psychometric analyses of the three surveys provided support for five composite measures: 1) Effort in Coordinating Patient Care, 2) Quality of Patient Information Received, 3) Organizational Support for Transitional Care, 4) Access to Community Resources, and 5) Strength of Relationships Among Community Providers. All factor loadings and reliability estimates were acceptable (loadings ≥ 0.40, α ≥ 0.70), and the fit indices showed a good model fit. All composite measures positively and significantly correlated with the overall ratings (0.13 ≤ r ≤ 0.71).

conclusionsWe determined that the items and composite measures assessing the barriers and facilitators to care transitions within this survey are reliable and demonstrate satisfactory psychometric properties. The instruments may be useful to healthcare organizations and researchers to assess the quality of care transitions and target areas of improvement across different provider settings.

Indexed as

Patient-Centered CarePatient TransferHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesACHIEVEBarriersCare transitionsComposite measuresFacilitatorsHealth care surveysProvider experiencePsychometricsTransitional care

Identifiers

PMID34016113
PMCPMC8136156
OpenAlexW3162579205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.