Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34015863›Full record

ArticleGlobal change biology2021

Increased connectivity and depth improve the effectiveness of marine reserves.

Jordan S Goetze, Shaun Wilson, Ben Radford, Rebecca Fisher, Tim J Langlois, Jacquomo Monk, Nathan A Knott, Hamish Malcolm, Leanne M Currey-Randall, Daniel Ierodiaconou and 25 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global change biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Conservation benefits of a large marine protected area network that spans multiple ecosystems.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Seascape ecology of juvenile gadoid nursery areas.Royal Society open science · 2025
    Article
  8. Application of spatially robust stereo-BRUV sampling for quantifying fish assemblages in UK marine protected areas.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Effects of human footprint and biophysical factors on the body-size structure of fished marine species.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

35 authors.

Jordan S GoetzeDepartment of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Marine Science Program, Biodiversity and Conservation Science, Kensington, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3090-9763
Shaun WilsonDepartment of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Marine Science Program, Biodiversity and Conservation Science, Kensington, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4590-0948
Ben RadfordThe UWA Oceans Institute, Indian Ocean Marine Research Centre, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1715-9109
Rebecca FisherAustralian Institute of Marine Science, Indian Ocean Marine Research Centre, UWA (MO96), Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5148-6731
Tim J LangloisThe UWA Oceans Institute, Indian Ocean Marine Research Centre, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6404-4000
Jacquomo MonkInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1874-0619
Nathan A KnottFisheries Research, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Huskisson, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7873-0412
Hamish MalcolmFisheries Research, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Coffs Harbour, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7315-1537
Leanne M Currey-RandallAustralian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, Qld, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3772-1288
Daniel IerodiaconouSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Centre for Integrative Ecology, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Vic., Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7832-4801
David HarastiFisheries Research, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Taylors Beach, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2851-9838
Neville BarrettInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6167-1356
Russell C BabcockCSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, St Lucia, Qld, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7756-1290
Nestor E BoschThe UWA Oceans Institute, Indian Ocean Marine Research Centre, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0421-8456
Danny BrockDepartment for Environment and Water SA, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Joachim ClaudetNational Center for Scientific Research, PSL Université Paris, CRIOBE, USR 3278 CNRS-EPHE-UPVD, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6295-1061
Jock CloughThe UWA Oceans Institute, Indian Ocean Marine Research Centre, Perth, WA, Australia.
David V FaircloughWestern Australian Fisheries and Marine Research Laboratories, Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Government of Western Australia, North Beach, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9620-5064
Michelle R HeupelAustralian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, Qld, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8245-7332
Thomas H HolmesDepartment of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Marine Science Program, Biodiversity and Conservation Science, Kensington, WA, Australia.
Charlie HuveneersSouthern Shark Ecology Group, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8937-1358
Alan R JordanInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1135-1618
Dianne McLeanThe UWA Oceans Institute, Indian Ocean Marine Research Centre, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0306-8348
Mark MeekanAustralian Institute of Marine Science, Indian Ocean Marine Research Centre, UWA (MO96), Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3067-9427
David MillerDepartment for Environment and Water SA, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Stephen J NewmanWestern Australian Fisheries and Marine Research Laboratories, Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Government of Western Australia, North Beach, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5324-5568
Matthew J ReesAustralian Institute of Marine Science, Indian Ocean Marine Research Centre, UWA (MO96), Perth, WA, Australia.
Kelsey E RobertsSchool of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8422-632X
Benjamin J SaundersSchool of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1929-518X
Conrad W SpeedAustralian Institute of Marine Science, Indian Ocean Marine Research Centre, UWA (MO96), Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3186-8710
Michael J TraversWestern Australian Fisheries and Marine Research Laboratories, Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Government of Western Australia, North Beach, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3072-1699
Eric TremlSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Centre for Integrative Ecology, Deakin University, Geelong, Vic., Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4844-4420
Sasha K WhitmarshSouthern Shark Ecology Group, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8934-2354
Corey B WakefieldWestern Australian Fisheries and Marine Research Laboratories, Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Government of Western Australia, North Beach, WA, Australia.
Euan S HarveySchool of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9069-4581

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marine reserves are a key tool for the conservation of marine biodiversity, yet only ~2.5% of the world's oceans are protected. The integration of marine reserves into connected networks representing all habitats has been encouraged by international agreements, yet the benefits of this design has not been tested empirically. Australia has one of the largest systems of marine reserves, providing a rare opportunity to assess how connectivity influences conservation success. An Australia-wide dataset was collected using baited remote underwater video systems deployed across a depth range from 0 to 100 m to assess the effectiveness of marine reserves for protecting teleosts subject to commercial and recreational fishing. A meta-analytical comparison of 73 fished species within 91 marine reserves found that, on average, marine reserves had 28% greater abundance and 53% greater biomass of fished species compared to adjacent areas open to fishing. However, benefits of protection were not observed across all reserves (heterogeneity), so full subsets generalized additive modelling was used to consider factors that influence marine reserve effectiveness, including distance-based and ecological metrics of connectivity among reserves. Our results suggest that increased connectivity and depth improve the aforementioned marine reserve benefits and that these factors should be considered to optimize such benefits over time. We provide important guidance on factors to consider when implementing marine reserves for the purpose of increasing the abundance and size of fished species, given the expected increase in coverage globally. We show that marine reserves that are highly protected (no-take) and designed to optimize connectivity, size and depth range can provide an effective conservation strategy for fished species in temperate and tropical waters within an overarching marine biodiversity conservation framework.

Indexed as

BiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesAnimalsAustraliaEcosystemFisheriesFishesOceans and Seasfully protected areasmarine conservationmarine protected areasmarine reserve designmarine reserve effectivenessmeta-analysissanctuaries

Identifiers

PMID34015863
PMCPMC8360116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.