Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34015334›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of biological chemistry2021

Seeing beyond the limit: A guide to choosing the right super-resolution microscopy technique.

Jessica Valli, Adrian Garcia-Burgos, Liam M Rooney, Beatriz Vale de Melo E Oliveira, Rory R Duncan, Colin Rickman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Case Study: Illuminating the Nanoscale World of Microbiology.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Exploring Biophysics at the Membrane with Single-Molecule TIRF Microscopy.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Advanced optical microscopy methods forBiophysical reviews · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jessica ValliEdinburgh Super Resolution Imaging Consortium (ESRIC), Institute of Biological Chemistry, Biophysics and Bioengineering, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. Electronic address: j.valli@hw.ac.uk.
Adrian Garcia-BurgosEdinburgh Super Resolution Imaging Consortium (ESRIC), Institute of Biological Chemistry, Biophysics and Bioengineering, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Liam M RooneyEdinburgh Super Resolution Imaging Consortium (ESRIC), Institute of Biological Chemistry, Biophysics and Bioengineering, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Beatriz Vale de Melo E OliveiraEdinburgh Super Resolution Imaging Consortium (ESRIC), Institute of Biological Chemistry, Biophysics and Bioengineering, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Rory R DuncanEdinburgh Super Resolution Imaging Consortium (ESRIC), Institute of Biological Chemistry, Biophysics and Bioengineering, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Colin RickmanEdinburgh Super Resolution Imaging Consortium (ESRIC), Institute of Biological Chemistry, Biophysics and Bioengineering, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. Electronic address: c.rickman@hw.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Super-resolution microscopy has become an increasingly popular and robust tool across the life sciences to study minute cellular structures and processes. However, with the increasing number of available super-resolution techniques has come an increased complexity and burden of choice in planning imaging experiments. Choosing the right super-resolution technique to answer a given biological question is vital for understanding and interpreting biological relevance. This is an often-neglected and complex task that should take into account well-defined criteria (e.g., sample type, structure size, imaging requirements). Trade-offs in different imaging capabilities are inevitable; thus, many researchers still find it challenging to select the most suitable technique that will best answer their biological question. This review aims to provide an overview and clarify the concepts underlying the most commonly available super-resolution techniques as well as guide researchers through all aspects that should be considered before opting for a given technique.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell SurvivalFluorescent DyesHumansMicroscopyMolecular Dynamics SimulationFluorescent Dyesdiffraction limitfluorescenceimaginglocalizationmicroscopymolecular dynamicsmolecular imagingprotein–protein interactionssuper resolution

Identifiers

PMID34015334
PMCPMC8246591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.