Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34015046›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2021

Acceptability of a nurse-led, person-centred, anticipatory care planning intervention for older people at risk of functional decline: A qualitative study.

Dagmar A S Corry, Julie Doherty, Gillian Carter, Frank Doyle, Tom Fahey, Peter O'Halloran, Kieran McGlade, Emma Wallace, Kevin Brazil

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dagmar A S CorryCentre for Evidence and Social Innovation, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0922-409X
Julie DohertyCentre for Evidence and Social Innovation, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
Gillian CarterCentre for Evidence and Social Innovation, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
Frank DoyleDepartment of General Practice, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.
Tom FaheyDepartment of General Practice, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.
Peter O'HalloranCentre for Evidence and Social Innovation, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
Kieran McGladeSchool of Medicine, Dentistry, and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Dunluce Health Centre, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
Emma WallaceDepartment of General Practice, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.
Kevin BrazilCentre for Evidence and Social Innovation, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs the population of older adults increases, the complexity of care required to support those who choose to remain in the community amplifies. Anticipatory Care Planning (ACP), through earlier identification of healthcare needs, is evidenced to improve quality of life, decrease aggressive interventions, and prolong life. With patient acceptability of growing importance in the design, implementation, and evaluation of healthcare interventions, this study reports on the acceptability of a primary care based ACP intervention on the island of Ireland.

methodsAs part of the evaluation of a feasibility cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT) testing an ACP intervention for older people at risk of functional decline, intervention participants [n = 34] were interviewed in their homes at 10-week follow-up to determine acceptability. The intervention consisted of home visits by specifically trained registered nurses who assessed participants' health, discussed their health goals and plans, and devised an anticipatory care plan in collaboration with participants' GPs and adjunct clinical pharmacist. Thematic analysis was employed to analyze interview data. The feasibility cRCT involved eight general practitioner (GP) practices as cluster sites, stratified by jurisdiction, four in Northern Ireland (NI) (two intervention, two control), and four in the Republic of Ireland (ROI) (two intervention, two control). Participants were assessed for risk of functional decline. A total of 34 patients received the intervention and 31 received usual care.

findingsThematic analysis resulted in five main themes: timing of intervention, understanding of ACP, personality & individual differences, loneliness & social isolation, and views on healthcare provision. These map across the Four Factor Model of Acceptability ('4FMA'), a newly developed conceptual framework comprising four components: intervention factors, personal factors, social support factors, and healthcare provision factors.

conclusionAcceptability of this primary care based ACP intervention was high, with nurses' home visits, GP anchorage, multidisciplinary working, personalized approach, and active listening regarded as beneficial. Appropriate timing, and patient health education emerged as vital.

Indexed as

Nurse's RoleQualitative ResearchAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMaleNorthern IrelandPrimary Health CareQuality of LifeRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID34015046
PMCPMC8136649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.