Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34015021›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2021

Mobilising social support to improve mental health for children and adolescents: A systematic review using principles of realist synthesis.

Annette Bauer, Madeleine Stevens, Daniel Purtscheller, Martin Knapp, Peter Fonagy, Sara Evans-Lacko, Jean Paul

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Impacts of the Attachment and Child Health (ATTACHInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Relationship Between Nonsuicidal Self-Injury and Family Resilience Among Adolescents: A Moderated Mediation Model].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The changing impacts of social determinants on youth mental health in Australia.The International journal of social psychiatry · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Annette BauerCare Policy and Evaluation Centre (CPEC), London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5156-1631
Madeleine StevensCare Policy and Evaluation Centre (CPEC), London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom.
Daniel PurtschellerDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Martin KnappCare Policy and Evaluation Centre (CPEC), London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom.
Peter FonagyDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0229-0091
Sara Evans-LackoCare Policy and Evaluation Centre (CPEC), London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom.
Jean PaulDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0891-7035

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social support is a well-recognised protective factor for children's mental health. Whilst many interventions exist that seek to mobilise social support to improve children's mental health, not much is known about how to best do this. We sought to generate knowledge about the ways in which social support can be mobilised to improve children's mental health. We conducted a systematic review, which followed the principles of a realist synthesis. The following databases were searched: PubMed, CINAHL, Ovid MEDLINE, PsychINFO, EMBASE, Child and Adolescent Studies, EconLit and SocINDEX. Studies were included if the age of participants was between 0 and 18 years and they evaluated or described programme theories of interventions that sought to improve children's mental health by mobilising social support. Relevance and quality of studies were assessed, and data were extracted and analysed narratively. Thirty-three articles were included. Studies varied substantially with regard to the detail in which they described the processes of mobilising social support and expected mechanisms to improve children's mental health. Those that provided this detail showed the following: Intervention components included explaining the benefits of social support and relationships to families and modelling friendly relationships to improve social skills. Pathways to improved outcomes reflected bi-directional and dynamic relationships between social support and mental health, and complex and long-term processes of establishing relationship qualities such as trust and reciprocity. Parents' ability to mobilise social support for themselves and on behalf of children was assumed to impact on their children's mental health, and (future) ability to mobilise social support. Although interventions were considered affordable, some required substantial human and financial resources from existing systems. Mobilising social support for vulnerable children can be a complex process that requires careful planning, and theory-informed evaluations can have an important role in increasing knowledge about how to best address social support and loneliness in children.

Indexed as

Mental HealthSocial SupportAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantInfant, Newborn

Identifiers

PMID34015021
PMCPMC8136658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.