Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34014992›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Influence of genetic background and dietary oleic acid on gut microbiota composition in Duroc and Iberian pigs.

Adrián López-García, Rita Benítez, Yolanda Núñez, Emilio Gómez-Izquierdo, Eduardo de Mercado, Juan M García-Casco, Óscar González-Recio, Clemente López-Bote, Jordi Estellé, Cristina Óvilo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Dietary effects ofVeterinary and animal science · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Gut microbiota and meat quality.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Adrián López-GarcíaDepartment of Animal Breeding, INIA, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8649-750X
Rita BenítezDepartment of Animal Breeding, INIA, Madrid, Spain.
Yolanda NúñezDepartment of Animal Breeding, INIA, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5988-7628
Emilio Gómez-IzquierdoPig Test Center ITACYL, Hontalbilla, Segovia, Spain.
Eduardo de MercadoPig Test Center ITACYL, Hontalbilla, Segovia, Spain.
Juan M García-CascoDepartment of Animal Breeding, INIA, Madrid, Spain.
Óscar González-RecioDepartment of Animal Breeding, INIA, Madrid, Spain.
Clemente López-BoteDepartment of Animal Production, Veterinary Faculty, UCM, Madrid, Spain.
Jordi EstelléGABI, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Cristina ÓviloDepartment of Animal Breeding, INIA, Madrid, Spain.
Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria · ESHospital General De Segovia · ESAgroParisTech · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhenotypic variability for productive and meat quality traits has been largely studied in Iberian pigs, especially in genetic selection and nutritional experiments. Complex interactions among genetic background, diet composition and gut microbiota hinder the correct assessment of each factor's contribution on phenotypes. In order to disentangle these interactions, we evaluated changes in gut microbiota composition comparing 48 Iberian and Duroc pigs fed diets with different energy source (standard diet with carbohydrates vs sunflower oil-enriched diet with high oleic acid content).

resultsA higher richness was observed for Iberian pigs (p < 0.05) and compositional analysis was applied for beta-diversity, differential abundance and pairwise log-ratio analyses. We found significant differences in overall microbiota composition between breeds, and also between diets inside breeds, to a lesser extent. Differential abundance analysis revealed that Duroc animals have more proportion of Actinobacteria and Prevotella, while Iberian replace those microorganisms with other more variable taxa. According to dietary differences, high-oleic fed animals were richer in Prevotella. We also found microbial ratios capable of separating animals by breeds and diets, mostly related to Actinobacteria.

conclusionThis study reveals that both genetic background and diet composition might have a relevant impact in gut microbiota composition. The application of compositional data analysis has facilitated the identification of microorganisms and ratios as possibly related to metabolic changes due to genetic background and, to a lower extent, to dietary changes. This may lead to a relevant progress in the knowledge of interactions between pig genetics, environment and gut microbiota.

Indexed as

ActinobacteriaAnimal FeedPrevotellaSwineAnimalsFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMaleOleic AcidOleic Acid

Identifiers

PMID34014992
PMCPMC8136687
OpenAlexW3117710481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.