Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34014742›Full record

ReviewExperimental and clinical psychopharmacology2021

Cumulative disadvantage as a framework for understanding rural tobacco use disparities.

Jenny E Ozga, Katelyn F Romm, Nicholas A Turiano, Ashley Douglas, Geri Dino, Linda Alexander, Melissa D Blank

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. A comparison of classifications for geographic location and their associations with tobacco use among US adults.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Considering Relative Rurality in Tobacco Regulatory Science.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  7. Identifying risk factors for adverse lung health outcomes among rural Appalachian women.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jenny E OzgaDepartment of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry.ORCID 0000-0003-2543-561X
Katelyn F RommMilken Institute School of Public Health.
Nicholas A TurianoDepartment of Psychology.
Ashley DouglasDepartment of Psychology.
Geri DinoDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences.
Linda AlexanderDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences.
Melissa D BlankDepartment of Psychology.
Milken Institute · US

Funding

Predicting longitudinal patterns of change in adolescent polytobacco use: A socio-ecological frameworkR21DA051628 · NIDA · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI BLANK, MELISSA D · 2020 to 2021
$433k
Food and Drug Administration; Center for Tobacco ProductsNational Institutes of Health; National Institute on Drug AbuseNIDA NIH HHS R21 DA051628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional tobacco product (cigarettes and smokeless tobacco) and polytobacco use rates are significantly higher among rural adolescents and adults compared to their nonrural counterparts. Such disparities are due to several factors that promote tobacco use initiation and continuation, including individual-level psychopharmacological factors and structural-level factors such as fewer tobacco control efforts (e.g., fewer smoke-free policies and lower tobacco excise taxes), targeted tobacco marketing, less access to health-relevant resources, and more positive cultural norms surrounding tobacco use in rural communities. In this review, we use cumulative disadvantage theory as a framework for understanding how psychopharmacological and structural-level factors serve as drivers of tobacco use in rural areas. We start by describing how structural-level differences between rural-nonrural communities impact psychopharmacological influences and, when available, how these factors influence tobacco use. We conclude by discussing the interplay between factors, providing suggestions for ways to assess our application of cumulative disadvantage theory empirically and making recommendations for research and policy implementation in rural areas. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Rural PopulationTobacco ProductsAdolescentAdultHumansTaxesTobacco Use

Identifiers

PMID34014742
PMCPMC9752977
OpenAlexW3162682118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.