Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34014709›Full record

ArticlePsychological review2021

Temporal and state abstractions for efficient learning, transfer, and composition in humans.

Liyu Xia, Anne G E Collins

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Naturally disengaging control to reveal habits.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Entorhinal Cortex Signals Dimensions of Past Experience That Can Be Generalized in a Novel Environment.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Naturalistic reinforcement learning.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Contextual inference in learning and memory.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Credit assignment in hierarchical option transfer.CogSci ... Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society (U.S.). Conference · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Advances in modeling learning and decision-making in neuroscience.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Liyu XiaDepartment of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley.
Anne G E CollinsDepartment of Psychology, Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley.ORCID 0000-0003-3751-3662
University of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

The neural computations supporting hierarchical reinforcement learningR01MH119383 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI COLLINS, ANNE G.E. · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH119383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans use prior knowledge to efficiently solve novel tasks, but how they structure past knowledge during learning to enable such fast generalization is not well understood. We recently proposed that hierarchical state abstraction enabled generalization of simple one-step rules, by inferring context clusters for each rule. However, humans' daily tasks are often temporally extended, and necessitate more complex multi-step, hierarchically structured strategies. The options framework in hierarchical reinforcement learning provides a theoretical framework for representing such transferable strategies. Options are abstract multi-step policies, assembled from simpler one-step actions or other options, that can represent meaningful reusable strategies as temporal abstractions. We developed a novel sequential decision-making protocol to test if humans learn and transfer multi-step options. In a series of four experiments, we found transfer effects at multiple hierarchical levels of abstraction that could not be explained by flat reinforcement learning models or hierarchical models lacking temporal abstractions. We extended the options framework to develop a quantitative model that blends temporal and state abstractions. Our model captures the transfer effects observed in human participants. Our results provide evidence that humans create and compose hierarchical options, and use them to explore in novel contexts, consequently transferring past knowledge and speeding up learning. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

LearningReinforcement, PsychologyConcept FormationGeneralization, PsychologicalHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID34014709
PMCPMC8485577
OpenAlexW3161191500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.