Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34014339›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2022

Both younger and elderly patients in pain are willing to undergo knee replacement despite the COVID-19 pandemic: a study on surgical waiting lists.

Enrique Gómez-Barrena, Israel Rubio-Saez, Norma G Padilla-Eguiluz, Pablo Hernandez-Esteban

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Milder impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the practice of orthopaedic surgery in Greece and Cyprus than other European countries.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Enrique Gómez-BarrenaOrthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Department, Knee Unit, Hospital La Paz, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Pº Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain. egomezb@salud.madrid.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1065-6137
Israel Rubio-SaezOrthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Department, Knee Unit, Hospital La Paz, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Pº Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
Norma G Padilla-EguiluzOrthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Department, Knee Unit, Hospital La Paz, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Pº Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
Pablo Hernandez-EstebanOrthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Department, Knee Unit, Hospital La Paz, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Pº Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify factors influencing patient's availability to re-schedule primary total knee replacement (TKR) or revision (RKR) surgery after the lockdown (March-May 2020) during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsA prospective cohort study through a telephone survey was performed in 156 patients (143 for primary and 13 for revision) included in the TKR and RKR surgical waiting list before March 2020. Contact of each patient with COVID-19, stress and anxiety, perceived pain, and function were obtained in the interviews, and also the preference of each patient to have re-scheduled surgery (early or late). Finally, we registered their response (acceptance or refusal) when surgery was effectively re-scheduled.

results88 out of 156 patients waiting for knee replacement (76/143 of those waiting for TKR, 12/13 of those waiting for RKR) declared themselves ready for surgery in less than 1 month. When re-scheduled, 115 patients underwent surgery and 41 refused. Significantly different preferences were found for age (more prone to surgery if under 65), revision surgery (more readily available), pain (7.9 ± 1.7/10 in NRS in those undergoing surgery, 5.6 ± 2.3/10 in those refusing, p = 0.000), or COVID-19 diagnosis, but not other close contact with COVID-19, comorbidities, stress, or anxiety. A logistic regression model confirmed that revision surgery (OR 9.33), perceived severe pain (OR 5.21), and age under 65 years (OR 5.82) were significantly associated with patient preference. The probability of patients over 65 to prefer early surgery reached 60% only with pain at or above 9/10.

conclusionsSurgical timing preferences for knee replacement vary between patients older than 65 years (immediate surgery only when pain is intense) and younger patients (immediate surgery no matter the amount of pain). Even if COVID-19 severely stroke our population, the need for knee replacement stood in the young population and even in the aged population at risk for COVID when pain was important.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeCOVID-19Osteoarthritis, KneeAgedCommunicable Disease ControlCOVID-19 TestingHumansPainPandemicsProspective StudiesWaiting ListsCOVID-19Knee replacementPatient availabilitySurgery preferencesWaiting list

Identifiers

PMID34014339
PMCPMC8136098
OpenAlexW3161870629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.