ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2021
Lack of association between proton pump inhibitor use and decline in cognitive performance in the ELSA-Brasil cohort.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe study aims to investigate the longitudinal association of use and time of use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) with decreased performance in three cognitive tests.
methodsProspective cohort study included 7115 participants with mean age of 58.9 years at baseline (2008-2010) who participated in the second wave (2012-2014) of ELSA-Brasil (average interval between visits = 3.9 years (range: 1.7 to 6.0 years)). Cognitive performance was assessed by tests of memory, phonemic and semantic verbal fluency, and the trail making test, applied to both waves. Associations with the use and time of use of PPIs at baseline were investigated using linear models with mixed effects after adjusting for confounding factors.
resultsAt baseline, 7.4% (529) of the participants used PPIs on a regular basis. After all adjustments, the interaction term use of PPI × age was not statistically significant for the cognitive tests evaluated, indicating that the use of PPI at baseline was not associated with a more accelerated decline in cognitive performance between waves. The interaction term PPI use × age was not statistically significant, in any of the categories of medication use time, any of the cognitive function tests evaluated, indicating that PPI use time is not associated with decrease in cognitive scores as the time interval between visits increases.
conclusionIn this cohort middle-aged and elderly adults, after average interval of 3.9 years (relatively short time to detect cognitive decline in a young cohort), the use and time of use of PPIs at the beginning of the study were not associated with a decline in cognitive performance in these tests between visits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.