Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34013998›Full record

SynthesisClinical cardiology2021

Cardiovascular safety of febuxostat compared to allopurinol for the treatment of gout: A systematic and meta-analysis.

Linggen Gao, Bin Wang, Ying Pan, Yan Lu, Rui Cheng

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comprehensive Review on Febuxostat for Hyperuricemia with Gout: Insights from Current Practice and Clinical Trials.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Biodegradation of Inosine and Guanosine byInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Linggen GaoDepartment of Comprehensive Surgery, General Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army & National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disease, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2185-9936
Bin WangDepartment of Comprehensive Surgery, General Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army & National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disease, Beijing, China.
Ying PanDepartment of Comprehensive Surgery, General Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army & National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disease, Beijing, China.
Yan LuDepartment of Comprehensive Surgery, General Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army & National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disease, Beijing, China.
Rui ChengDepartment of Comprehensive Surgery, General Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army & National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disease, Beijing, China.
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CN

Funding

the Military Healthcare Fund 17BJZ48
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cardiovascular safety of febuxostat compared to allopurinol for the treatment of gout remains equivocal. Febuxostat had a better safety outcome compared with allopurinol. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE and Embase for articles published between March 1, 2000 and April 4, 2021, without any language restrictions. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of included clinical trials to evaluate the cardiovascular safety of febuxostat compared to allopurinol for treatment of chronic gout. Two reviewers independently selected studies, assessed study quality, and extracted data. Risk ratios were calculated with random effects and were reported with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). From 240 potentially relevant citations, 224 papers were excluded; 16 studies were ultimately included in the analysis. Febuxostat had a better safety outcome compared with allopurinol,which was the composite of urgent coronary revascularization (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.77-0.90, p < .0001) and stroke (OR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.79-0.97, p = .009). However, that difference was not found in nonfatal myocardial infarction (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.80-1.22, p = .91), cardiovascular related mortality (OR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.69-1.38, p = .89) and all-cause mortality (OR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.75-1.15, p = .52). No significant differences in cardiovascular related mortality and all-cause mortality were observed across any subgroup. This meta-analysis adds new evidence regarding the cardiovascular safety of febuxostat in patients. Initiation of febuxostat in patients was not associated with an increased risk of death or serious cardiovascular related adverse events compared with allopurinol.

Indexed as

GoutHyperuricemiaMyocardial InfarctionAllopurinolFebuxostatGout SuppressantsHumansAllopurinolFebuxostatGout Suppressantsallopurinolcardiovascular safetyfebuxostat

Identifiers

PMID34013998
PMCPMC8259158
OpenAlexW3160480599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.