Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34013982›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2021

Soil fertility relates to fungal-mediated decomposition and organic matter turnover in a temperate mountain forest.

Mathias Mayer, Boris Rewald, Bradley Matthews, Hans Sandén, Christoph Rosinger, Klaus Katzensteiner, Markus Gorfer, Harald Berger, Claudia Tallian, Torsten W Berger and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mathias MayerForest Soils and Biogeochemistry, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), Zürcherstrasse 111, Birmensdorf, 8903, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4366-9188
Boris RewaldDepartment of Forest and Soil Sciences, Institute of Forest Ecology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Peter-Jordan Straße 82, Vienna, 1190, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8098-0616
Bradley MatthewsDepartment of Forest and Soil Sciences, Institute of Forest Ecology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Peter-Jordan Straße 82, Vienna, 1190, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9710-7688
Hans SandénDepartment of Forest and Soil Sciences, Institute of Forest Ecology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Peter-Jordan Straße 82, Vienna, 1190, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2496-6307
Christoph RosingerDepartment of Forest and Soil Sciences, Institute of Forest Ecology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Peter-Jordan Straße 82, Vienna, 1190, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4973-3921
Klaus KatzensteinerDepartment of Forest and Soil Sciences, Institute of Forest Ecology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Peter-Jordan Straße 82, Vienna, 1190, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0534-8391
Markus GorferBioresources Unit, Center for Health & Bioresources, Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH (AIT), Konrad-Lorenz-Straße 24,, Tulln, 3430, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-3010-6044
Harald BergerSymbiocyte, Vorgartenstraße 145, Vienna, 1020, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7974-3058
Claudia TallianBioresources Unit, Center for Health & Bioresources, Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH (AIT), Konrad-Lorenz-Straße 24,, Tulln, 3430, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0790-3881
Torsten W BergerDepartment of Forest and Soil Sciences, Institute of Forest Ecology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Peter-Jordan Straße 82, Vienna, 1190, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5614-5888
Douglas L GodboldDepartment of Forest and Soil Sciences, Institute of Forest Ecology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Peter-Jordan Straße 82, Vienna, 1190, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5607-5800

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF J 4369Austrian Science Fund FWF P 29087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fungi are known to exert a significant influence over soil organic matter (SOM) turnover, however understanding of the effects of fungal community structure on SOM dynamics and its consequences for ecosystem fertility is fragmentary. Here we studied soil fungal guilds and SOM decomposition processes along a fertility gradient in a temperate mountain beech forest. High-throughput sequencing was used to investigate fungal communities. Carbon and nitrogen stocks, enzymatic activity and microbial respiration were measured. While ectomycorrhizal fungal abundance was not related to fertility, saprotrophic ascomycetes showed higher relative abundances under more fertile conditions. The activity of oxidising enzymes and respiration rates in mineral soil were related positively to fertility and saprotrophic fungi. In addition, organic layer carbon and nitrogen stocks were lower on the more fertile plots, although tree biomass and litter input were higher. Together, the results indicated a faster SOM turnover at the fertile end of the gradient. We suggest that there is a positive feedback mechanism between SOM turnover and fertility that is mediated by soil fungi to a significant extent. By underlining the importance of fungi for soil fertility and plant growth, these findings furthermore emphasise the dependency of carbon cycling on fungal communities below ground.

Indexed as

MycobiomeSoilCarbonEcosystemForestsFungiSoil MicrobiologyCarbonSoilcarbon cycleectomycorrhizal fungiEllenberg indicator valuesenzymesfungal guildsGadgil effectplant-soil feedbackpriming

Identifiers

PMID34013982
PMCPMC7611052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.