Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34013632›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2021

Landscape analyses using eDNA metabarcoding and Earth observation predict community biodiversity in California.

Meixi Lin, Ariel Levi Simons, Ryan J Harrigan, Emily E Curd, Fabian D Schneider, Dannise V Ruiz-Ramos, Zack Gold, Melisa G Osborne, Sabrina Shirazi, Teia M Schweizer and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Combining environmental DNA and remote sensing for efficient, fine-scale mapping of arthropod biodiversity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Darwinian genomics and diversity in the tree of life.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Landscape analyses using eDNA metabarcoding and Earth observation predict community biodiversity in California.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Meixi LinDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5233-0675
Ariel Levi SimonsDepartment of Marine and Environmental Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, 90089, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0492-5492
Ryan J HarriganCenter for Tropical Research, Institute of the Environment and Sustainability, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, 90095, USA.
Emily E CurdDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, 90095, USA.
Fabian D SchneiderJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, California, 91009, USA.
Dannise V Ruiz-RamosColumbia Environmental Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Columbia, Missouri, 65201, USA.
Zack GoldDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, 90095, USA.
Melisa G OsborneDepartment of Molecular and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, 90089, USA.
Sabrina ShiraziDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, 95064, USA.
Teia M SchweizerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, 90095, USA.
Tiara N MooreDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2422-6472
Emma A FoxDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, 90095, USA.
Rachel TurbaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3388-4503
Ana E Garcia-VedrenneDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, 90095, USA.
Sarah K HelmanDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, 90095, USA.
Kelsi RutledgeDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, 90095, USA.
Maura Palacios MejiaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, 90095, USA.
Onny MarwayanaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, 90095, USA.
Miroslava N Munguia RamosDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, 90095, USA.
Regina WetzerResearch and Collections, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, California, 90007, USA.
N Dean PentcheffResearch and Collections, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, California, 90007, USA.
Emily Jane McTavishDepartment of Life & Environmental Sciences, University of California-Merced, Merced, California, 95343, USA.
Michael N DawsonDepartment of Life & Environmental Sciences, University of California-Merced, Merced, California, 95343, USA.
Beth ShapiroDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, 95064, USA.
Robert K WayneDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, 90095, USA.
Rachel S MeyerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, 90095, USA.

Funding

UPLIFT: UCLA Postdocs' Longitudinal Investment in Faculty TrainingK12GM106996 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CAREY, MICHAEL F, VILLANUEVA, CLAUDIO J · 2016 to 2025
$7.1M
Howard Hughes Medical Institute GT10483NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM106996
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecosystems globally are under threat from ongoing anthropogenic environmental change. Effective conservation management requires more thorough biodiversity surveys that can reveal system-level patterns and that can be applied rapidly across space and time. Using modern ecological models and community science, we integrate environmental DNA and Earth observations to produce a time snapshot of regional biodiversity patterns and provide multi-scalar community-level characterization. We collected 278 samples in spring 2017 from coastal, shrub, and lowland forest sites in California, a complex ecosystem and biodiversity hotspot. We recovered 16,118 taxonomic entries from eDNA analyses and compiled associated traditional observations and environmental data to assess how well they predicted alpha, beta, and zeta diversity. We found that local habitat classification was diagnostic of community composition and distinct communities and organisms in different kingdoms are predicted by different environmental variables. Nonetheless, gradient forest models of 915 families recovered by eDNA analysis and using BIOCLIM variables, Sentinel-2 satellite data, human impact, and topographical features as predictors, explained 35% of the variance in community turnover. Elevation, sand percentage, and photosynthetic activities (NDVI32) were the top predictors. In addition to this signal of environmental filtering, we found a positive relationship between environmentally predicted families and their numbers of biotic interactions, suggesting environmental change could have a disproportionate effect on community networks. Together, these analyses show that coupling eDNA with environmental predictors including remote sensing data has capacity to test proposed Essential Biodiversity Variables and create new landscape biodiversity baselines that span the tree of life.

Indexed as

DNA, EnvironmentalEcosystemBiodiversityCaliforniaDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicEnvironmental MonitoringDNA, Environmentalbeta diversitybiomonitoringcitizen sciencecommunity ecologyecological modelingenvironmental DNAgradient forestremote sensingzeta diversity

Identifiers

PMID34013632
PMCPMC9297316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.