Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34013536›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2021

Predictable and host-species specific humanization of the gut microbiota in captive primates.

Jennifer L Houtz, Jon G Sanders, Anthony Denice, Andrew H Moeller

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Metagenomic Comparison of Gut Microbes ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Origins and Evolution of NovelbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jennifer L HoutzDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1022-1398
Jon G SandersDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Anthony DeniceProject Chimps, Blue Ridge, GA, USA.
Andrew H MoellerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8377-4647
Cornell University · USWild Chimpanzee Foundation · DE

Funding

Uncovering the modes and genetics of gut bacterial transmissionR35GM138284 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI Andrew Moeller · 2020 to 2026
$2.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM138284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans and nonhuman primates (NHPs) harbor complex gut microbial communities that affect phenotypes and fitness. The gut microbiotas of wild NHPs reflect their hosts' phylogenetic histories and are compositionally distinct from those of humans, but in captivity the endogenous gut microbial lineages of NHPs can be lost or replaced by lineages found in humans. Despite its potential contributions to gastrointestinal dysfunction, this humanization of the gut microbiota has not been investigated systematically across captive NHP species. Here, we show through comparisons of well-sampled wild and captive populations of apes and monkeys that the fraction of the gut microbiota humanized by captivity varies significantly between NHP species but is remarkably reproducible between captive populations of the same NHP species. Conspecific captive populations displayed significantly greater than expected overlap in the sets of bacterial 16S rRNA gene variants that were differentially abundant between captivity and the wild. This overlap was evident even between captive populations residing on different continents but was never observed between heterospecific captive populations. In addition, we developed an approach incorporating human gut microbiota data to rank NHPs' gut microbial clades based on the propensity of their lineages to be lost or replaced in captivity by lineages found in humans. Relatively few microbial genera displayed reproducible degrees of humanization in different captive host species, but most microbial genera were reproducibly humanized or retained from the wild in conspecific pairs of captive populations. These results demonstrate that the gut microbiotas of captive NHPs display predictable, host-species specific responses to captivity.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnimalsHumansPhylogenyPrimatesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sarchaeabacteriacaptive populationsconservation biologymicrobial transmissionmicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID34013536
PMCPMC10039810
OpenAlexW3159123991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.