Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34013329›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2021

Reconciling multiple connectivity scores for drug repurposing.

Kewalin Samart, Phoebe Tuyishime, Arjun Krishnan, Janani Ravi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The inferred functional connectome underlying circadian synchronization in the mouse suprachiasmatic nucleus.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Integrative transcriptome-based drug repurposing in tuberculosis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Transcriptomic analysis revealsOncology letters · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kewalin SamartComputational Mathematics, and Computational Math, Science & Engineering at Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Phoebe TuyishimeCollege of Agriculture and Natural Resources at Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Arjun KrishnanDepartments of Computational Math, Science & Engineering, and Biochemistry & Molecular Biology at Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Janani RaviPathobiology and Diagnostic Investigation at Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.

Funding

Resolving and understanding the genomic basis of heterogeneous complex traits and diseasesR35GM128765 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI KRISHNAN, ARJUN · 2018 to 2022
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The basis of several recent methods for drug repurposing is the key principle that an efficacious drug will reverse the disease molecular 'signature' with minimal side effects. This principle was defined and popularized by the influential 'connectivity map' study in 2006 regarding reversal relationships between disease- and drug-induced gene expression profiles, quantified by a disease-drug 'connectivity score.' Over the past 15 years, several studies have proposed variations in calculating connectivity scores toward improving accuracy and robustness in light of massive growth in reference drug profiles. However, these variations have been formulated inconsistently using various notations and terminologies even though they are based on a common set of conceptual and statistical ideas. Therefore, we present a systematic reconciliation of multiple disease-drug similarity metrics ($ES$, $css$, $Sum$, $Cosine$, $XSum$, $XCor$, $XSpe$, $XCos$, $EWCos$) and connectivity scores ($CS$, $RGES$, $NCS$, $WCS$, $Tau$, $CSS$, $EMUDRA$) by defining them using consistent notation and terminology. In addition to providing clarity and deeper insights, this coherent definition of connectivity scores and their relationships provides a unified scheme that newer methods can adopt, enabling the computational drug-development community to compare and investigate different approaches easily. To facilitate the continuous and transparent integration of newer methods, this article will be available as a live document (https://jravilab.github.io/connectivity_scores) coupled with a GitHub repository (https://github.com/jravilab/connectivity_scores) that any researcher can build on and push changes to.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBiomarkersComputational BiologyDrug DiscoveryDrug RepositioningGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationHumansPharmacogeneticsTranscriptomeBiomarkersCMap and LINCS L1000connectivity mappingdisease gene signaturedrug repositioning/repurposingsimilarity metricstranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID34013329
PMCPMC8597919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.