Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34013139›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery protocols2021

Pre-Emptive Endoluminal Negative Pressure Therapy at the Anastomotic Site in Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy (the preSPONGE Trial): Study Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Philip C Müller, Diana Vetter, Joshua R Kapp, Christoph Gubler, Bernhard Morell, Dimitri A Raptis, Christian A Gutschow

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Philip C MüllerDepartment of Visceral und Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8317-3449
Diana VetterDepartment of Visceral und Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9622-0988
Joshua R KappDepartment of Visceral und Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland.
Christoph GublerDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0426-8069
Bernhard MorellDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8507-0619
Dimitri A RaptisDepartment of Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street London NW3 2QG, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0898-3270
Christian A GutschowDepartment of Visceral und Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6171-4427
University Hospital of Zurich · CHThe Royal Free Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAnastomotic leakage (AL) accounts for a significant proportion of morbidity following oesophagectomy. Endoluminal negative pressure (ENP) therapy via a specifically designed polyurethane foam (EsoSponge METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study design is a prospective, multi-centre, two-arm, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial and will be conducted in two phases. Phase one is a randomised feasibility and safety pilot trial involving 40 consecutive patients. After definitive sample size calculation, additional patients will be included accordingly during phase two. The primary outcome of the study will be the postoperative length of hospitalization until reaching previously defined "fit for discharge criteria". Secondary outcomes will include postoperative morbidity, mortality and postoperative AL-rates based on 90-day follow-up. A confirmatory analysis based on intention-to-treat will be performed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The ethics committee of the University of Zurich approved this study (2019-00562), which has been registered with

Indexed as

Anastomotic leakageendoluminal vacuum therapyminimally invasive oesophagectomyrandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID34013139
PMCPMC8114847
OpenAlexW3139428069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.