Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34013072›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2021

Sequence and structural analysis of COVID-19 E and M proteins with MERS virus E and M proteins-A comparative study.

Ebtisam A Aldaais, Subha Yegnaswamy, Fatimah Albahrani, Fatima Alsowaiket, Sarah Alramadan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Viruses · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Structural proteins of human coronaviruses: what makes them different?Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. SARS-CoV-2-Specific Immune Response and the Pathogenesis of COVID-19.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ebtisam A AldaaisDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, P.O. Box 2435, 31441, Saudi Arabia.
Subha YegnaswamyAldaais Research Group, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Dammam, P.O. Box 2435, 31451, Saudi Arabia.
Fatimah AlbahraniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, P.O. Box 2435, 31451, Saudi Arabia.
Fatima AlsowaiketDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, P.O. Box 2435, 31451, Saudi Arabia.
Sarah AlramadanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, P.O. Box 2435, 31451, Saudi Arabia.
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The outbreak of SARS in 2003, MERS in 2012, and now COVID-19 in 2019 has demonstrated that Coronaviruses are capable of causing primary lethal infections in humans, and the pandemic is now a global concern. The COVID-19 belongs to the beta coronavirus family encoding 29 proteins, of which four are structural, the Spike, Membrane, Envelope, and Nucleocapsid proteins. Here we have analyzed and compared the Membrane (M) and Envelope (E) proteins of COVID-19 and MERS with SARS and Bat viruses. The sequence analysis of conserved regions of both E and M proteins revealed that many regions of COVID-19 are similar to Bat and SARS viruses while the MERS virus showed variations. The essential binding motifs found in SARS appeared in COVID-19. Besides, the M protein of COVID-19 showed a distinct serine phosphorylation site in the C-terminal domain, which looked like a catalytic triad seen in serine proteases. A Dileucine motif occurred many times in the sequence of the M protein of all the four viruses compared. Concerning the structural part, the COVID-19 E protein showed more similarity to Bat while MERS shared similarity with the SARS virus. The M protein of both COVID-19 and MERS displayed variations in the structure. The interaction between M and E proteins was also studied to know the additional binding regions. Our study highlights the critical motifs and structural regions to be considered for further research to design better inhibitors for the infection caused by these viruses.

Indexed as

Beta coronavirusesCOVID-19E proteinM proteinsequence and structural analysis

Identifiers

PMID34013072
PMCPMC8120451
OpenAlexW3119612086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.