Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34013057›Full record

ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2021

Risk factor analysis for early rebleeding after endoscopic treatment for colonic diverticular bleeding with stigmata of recent hemorrhage.

Atsushi Yamauchi, Tadayuki Kou, Takuya Kishimoto, Yuki Mori, Kazuki Osawa, Kei Iimori, Kosuke Iwano, Yuya Kawai, Kenji Sawada, Kensuke Hamada and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Atsushi YamauchiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital Osaka Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7670-0359
Tadayuki KouDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital Osaka Japan.
Takuya KishimotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital Osaka Japan.
Yuki MoriDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital Osaka Japan.
Kazuki OsawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital Osaka Japan.
Kei IimoriDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital Osaka Japan.
Kosuke IwanoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital Osaka Japan.
Yuya KawaiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital Osaka Japan.
Kenji SawadaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital Osaka Japan.
Kensuke HamadaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital Osaka Japan.
Satoshi NishimuraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital Osaka Japan.
Yoshiharu MoriDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital Osaka Japan.
Kotaro WatanabeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital Osaka Japan.
Shunjiro AzumaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital Osaka Japan.
Toshihiro MoritaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital Osaka Japan.
Akira KuritaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital Osaka Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3047-7662
Kiyotaka KawaguchiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital Osaka Japan.
Yoshiki SuginoshitaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital Osaka Japan.
Toshiro KatayamaDepartment of Medical Engineering, Faculty of Health Science Morinomiya University of Medical Sciences Osaka Japan.
Shujiro YazumiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital Osaka Japan.
Kitano Hospital · JPMorinomiya University of Medical Sciences · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimColonic diverticular bleeding is a common cause of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopic hemostasis is generally selected as the first-line treatment; however, a considerable number of patients experience early rebleeding after endoscopic treatment. We investigated the risk factors for early rebleeding after endoscopic treatment.

methodsWe retrospectively evaluated the data of 142 consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic treatment (endoscopic clipping or endoscopic band ligation) for colonic diverticular bleeding with stigmata of recent hemorrhage between April 2012 and April 2020. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the statistical relationship between patient characteristics and the incidence of early rebleeding occurring within 30 days after endoscopic treatment.

resultsOf 142 patients, early rebleeding was detected in 34 (23.9%) patients. According to univariate analysis, platelet count of <10 × 10

conclusionsBleeding from the left-sided colon and endoscopic clipping usage were the risk factors for early rebleeding after endoscopic treatment. Using endoscopic band ligation was associated with a decreased risk for early rebleeding compared with the use of endoscopic clipping, indicating that endoscopic band ligation was a preferable endoscopic modality to prevent early recurrent bleeding.

Indexed as

endoscopic band ligationendoscopic clippingendoscopic modalityleft‐sided colonlower gastrointestinal bleeding

Identifiers

PMID34013057
PMCPMC8114991
OpenAlexW3142760355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.