Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34013052›Full record

ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2021

Video consultations during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic are associated with high satisfaction for both doctors and patients.

Leonardo Zorron Cheng Tao Pu, Manjri Raval, Ryma Terbah, Gurpreet Singh, Anton Rajadurai, Rhys Vaughan, Marios Efthymiou, Sujievvan Chandran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. And Still She Rises: Policies for Improving Women's Health for a More Equitable Post-Pandemic World.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Teleconsultation and videoconsultation forever?Medicina clinica (English ed.) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Leonardo Zorron Cheng Tao PuDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Austin Health Heidelberg Victoria Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7921-5631
Manjri RavalDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Austin Health Heidelberg Victoria Australia.
Ryma TerbahDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Austin Health Heidelberg Victoria Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3654-2437
Gurpreet SinghDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Austin Health Heidelberg Victoria Australia.
Anton RajaduraiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Austin Health Heidelberg Victoria Australia.
Rhys VaughanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Austin Health Heidelberg Victoria Australia.
Marios EfthymiouDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Austin Health Heidelberg Victoria Australia.
Sujievvan ChandranDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Austin Health Heidelberg Victoria Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimTelehealth has become the standard of care during the COVID-19 outbreak. This study aimed to assess doctor and patient satisfaction of endoscopy-related telehealth clinics with video consultations.

methodsA prospective observational study of patients consecutively booked to attend two endoscopy-related telehealth clinics at an ambulatory tertiary care setting was conducted from July to October 2020. Data collected from our previously published study using phone consultations (data collected in April-May 2020) were used as a control arm. The primary outcome (satisfaction) was assessed through the six-question score (6Q_score) as per previous research. Secondary outcomes included failure-to-attend (FTA) rate and perceived necessity of physical examination/in-person follow-up appointment.

resultsThere were 962 endoscopy clinic appointments between July and October, of which 157 were conducted through video. Data on 127 doctor questionnaires and 94 patient questionnaires were analyzed. The median age (years) of patients reviewed via video [57, interquartile range (IQR) 48-66] was lower than those reviewed via phone (65, IQR 55-74,

conclusionVideo consultations during the COVID-19 outbreak demonstrated higher patient and doctor satisfaction compared to phone consultations. There was no significant difference in FTA rates and need for in-person follow-up consultations/physical examination between the telehealth two modalities.

Indexed as

coronavirusCOVID‐19outpatient clinictelehealth

Identifiers

PMID34013052
PMCPMC8114984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.