ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2021
Disorganization of the retinal inner layers as a predictor of visual acuity in eyes with macular edema secondary to uveitis.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Baseline OCT biomarkers associated with visual prognosis in cystoid macular edema secondary to noninfectious uveitis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Retinal Biomarkers in Diabetic Retinopathy: From Early Detection to Personalized Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo assess the correlation between disorganization of the retinal inner layers (DRIL) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in patients with uveitis and macular edema (UME) who underwent systemic treatment using optical coherence tomography (OCT).
methodsA retrospective clinical study of 23 patients (30 eyes) with DRIL and 23 patients (31 eyes) without DRIL secondary to UME were included. All patients underwent comprehensive ophthalmic examinations at baseline, 3, 6, and 12mo after local and systemic treatment. The OCT-based parameters included foveal center point thickness (FCPT), mean thickness (MT), and diameters of DRIL in horizontal and vertical directions. BCVA and OCT-based parameters were compared between the two groups. The relationship between each OCT parameter and BCVA was evaluated using linear correlation and regression analysis.
resultsAt the initial visit, the mean baseline FCPT was 441.03±128.68 µm in the eyes with DRIL and 337.26±99.31 µm in the eyes without DRIL (
conclusionThe improvement in BCVA is associated with DRIL in patients with UME. DRIL is an easy-to-determine and robust imaging biomarker that could help predict BCVA prognosis in eyes with UME.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.