Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34012861›Full record

ReviewTranslational pediatrics2021

MR spectroscopy in pediatric neuroradiology.

Roberto Liserre, Lorenzo Pinelli, Roberto Gasparotti

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Translational pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The neuroradiology journal · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Methylmalonic acid: a new target for Hadamard-edited MRS.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Neuroinflammation and Pediatric Chronic Pain - A Review.Current pain and headache reports · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Cerebral magnetic resonance spectroscopy - insights into preterm brain injury.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Roberto LiserreDepartment of Radiology, Neuroradiology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili University Hospital, Brescia, Italy.
Lorenzo PinelliDepartment of Radiology, Neuroradiology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili University Hospital, Brescia, Italy.
Roberto GasparottiNeuroradiology Unit, Department of Medical-Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITUniversity of Brescia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), being able to identify and measure some brain components (metabolites) in pathologic lesions and in normal-appearing tissue, offers a valuable additional diagnostic tool to assess several pediatric neurological diseases. In this review we will illustrate the basic principles and clinical applications of brain proton (H

Indexed as

Brain disordersmagnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS)pediatrics

Identifiers

PMID34012861
PMCPMC8107850
OpenAlexW3154798002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.