ArticleTranslational pediatrics2021
Cesarean section and pregnancy outcomes of preterm premature rupture of membranes under different fertility policies in China.
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterization of Vaginal Microbiota in Third Trimester Premature Rupture of Membranes Patients through 16S rDNA Sequencing.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The Effect of Nursing Intervention Model Using Mobile Nursing System on Pregnancy Outcome of Pregnant Women.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
- Early-term birth and its association with universal two-child policy: a national cross-sectional study in China.BMJ open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of the present study was to compare the outcomes of pregnancies complicated by preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) in China.
methodsThe present study was a single-center retrospective study of women admitted to Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital in 2012, 2014, and 2017. Deliveries at <24 and >37 weeks, fatal deformities, stillbirths, and multiple pregnancies were excluded. Pregnancies were divided into 24-27
resultsThe rate of PPROM was 3.11% in 2012, 2.35% in 2014, and 2.4% in 2017; the difference was significant (P<0.001). Age [odds ratio (OR): 1.046, P<0.001], intrauterine infection (OR: 2.087, P=0.007), and vaginitis (OR: 1.812, P=0.039) were risk factors for PPROM. In all 3 years, patients with PPROM tended to choose vaginal delivery rather than cesarean section (CS) delivery (68.9% in 2012, P<0.001; 76.5% in 2014, P<0.001; 69.3% in 2017, P<0.001), and the rate of vaginal deliveries in 2014 was higher than that in 2012 and 2017 (P=0.027). Indications for PPROM at 34-36
conclusionsThe incidence rate of PPROM at our single center varied between 2012, 2014, and 2017. Risk factors for pregnancies complicated by PPROM include age, intrauterine infection, and vaginitis. The rate of CS delivery varied, and breech/transverse presentation was the major indication for patients with PPROM at 34-36
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.