ArticleNetwork modeling and analysis in health informatics and bioinformatics2021
Benchmarking mass spectrometry based proteomics algorithms using a simulated database.
Article in Network modeling and analysis in health informatics and bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein sequencing algorithms process data from a variety of instruments that has been generated under diverse experimental conditions. Currently there is no way to predict the accuracy of an algorithm for a given data set. Most of the published algorithms and associated software has been evaluated on limited number of experimental data sets. However, these performance evaluations do not cover the complete search space the algorithmand the software might encounter in real-world. To this end, we present a database of simulated spectra that can be used to benchmark any spectra to peptide search engine. We demonstrate the usability of this database by bench marking two popular peptide sequencing engines. We show wide variation in the accuracy of peptide deductions and a complete quality profile of a given algorithm can be useful for practitioners and algorithm developers. All benchmarking data is available at https://users.cs.fiu.edu/~fsaeed/Benchmark.html.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.