Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34012762›Full record

ArticleNanotechnology reviews2020

Degradation modeling of poly-l-lactide acid (PLLA) bioresorbable vascular scaffold within a coronary artery.

Shengmao Lin, Pengfei Dong, Changchun Zhou, Luis Augusto P Dallan, Vladislav N Zimin, Gabriel T R Pereira, Juhwan Lee, Yazan Gharaibeh, David L Wilson, Hiram G Bezerra and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanotechnology reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. InSilc Computational Tool forComputational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Application ofFrontiers in medical technology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Shengmao LinSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen, Fujian, 361024, China.
Pengfei DongDepartment of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL 32901, United States of America.
Changchun ZhouNational Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610064, China.
Luis Augusto P DallanCardiovascular Imaging Core Laboratory, Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, United States of America.
Vladislav N ZiminCardiovascular Imaging Core Laboratory, Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, United States of America.
Gabriel T R PereiraCardiovascular Imaging Core Laboratory, Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, United States of America.
Juhwan LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, United States of America.
Yazan GharaibehDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, United States of America.
David L WilsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, United States of America.
Hiram G BezerraInterventional Cardiology Center, Heart and Vascular Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33606, United States of America.
Linxia GuDepartment of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL 32901, United States of America.
Case Western Reserve University · USFlorida Institute of Technology · USSichuan University · CNUniversity of South Florida · USXiamen University of Technology · CN

Funding

Computer assisted coronary artery stent interventionsR01HL143484 · NHLBI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI BEZERRA, HIRAM, WILSON, DAVID LYNN · 2018 to 2021
$2.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL143484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work, a strain-based degradation model was implemented and validated to better understand the dynamic interactions between the bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) and the artery during the degradation process. Integrating the strain-modulated degradation equation into commercial finite element codes allows a better control and visualization of local mechanical parameters. Both strut thinning and discontinuity of the stent struts within an artery were captured and visualized. The predicted results in terms of mass loss and fracture locations were validated by the documented experimental observations. In addition, results suggested that the heterogeneous degradation of the stent depends on its strain distribution following deployment. Degradation is faster at the locations with higher strains and resulted in the strut thinning and discontinuity, which contributes to the continuous mass loss, and the reduced contact force between the BVS and artery. A nonlinear relationship between the maximum principal strain of the stent and the fracture time was obtained, which could be transformed to predict the degradation process of the BVS in different mechanical environments. The developed computational model provided more insights into the degradation process, which could complement the discrete experimental data for improving the design and clinical management of the BVS.

Indexed as

bioresorbable vascular scaffoldcoronary arterydegradationfinite element methodpercutaneous coronary interventionpoly-l-lactide acidstent

Identifiers

PMID34012762
PMCPMC8130847
OpenAlexW3116214621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.