Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34012720›Full record

ArticleACS catalysis2020

The Case for Enzymatic Competitive Metal Affinity Methods.

David J Reilley, Matthew R Hennefarth, Anastassia N Alexandrova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS catalysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. RSC advances · 2025
    Article
  2. Preorganized Electric Fields in Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Synthesis of metallic nanoparticles using biometabolites: mechanisms and applications.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Microbes vary strategically in their metalation of mononuclear enzymes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David J ReilleyDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, 607 Charles E. Young Drive East, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1569, USA.
Matthew R HennefarthDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, 607 Charles E. Young Drive East, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1569, USA.
Anastassia N AlexandrovaDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, 607 Charles E. Young Drive East, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1569, USA.

Funding

Redox enzymes - tuning and designR01GM134047 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ALEXANDROVA, ANASTASSIA N, YANG, JENNY · 2019 to 2022
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM134047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID34012720
PMCPMC8130888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.