Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34012607›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2021

Preoperative evaluation and indications for pulmonary metastasectomy.

Ryu Kanzaki, Eriko Fukui, Takashi Kanou, Naoko Ose, Soichiro Funaki, Masato Minami, Yasushi Shintani, Meinoshin Okumura

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Outcomes and prognostic factors of repeat pulmonary metastasectomy.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ryu KanzakiDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Eriko FukuiDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Takashi KanouDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Naoko OseDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Soichiro FunakiDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Masato MinamiDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Yasushi ShintaniDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Meinoshin OkumuraDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) is an established treatment that can provide improved long-term survival for patients with metastatic tumor(s) in the lung. In the current era, where treatment options other than PM such as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), immunotherapy, and molecular-targeted therapy are available, thoracic surgeons should review the approach to the preoperative evaluation and the indications. Preoperative evaluation consists of history and physical examinations, physiological tests, and radiological examinations. Radiological examinations serve to identify the differential diagnosis of the pulmonary nodules, evaluate their precise number, location, and features, and search for extra thoracic metastases. The indication of PM should be considered from both physiological and oncological points of view. The general criteria for PM are as follows; (I) the patient has a good general condition, (II) the primary malignancy is controlled, (III) there is no other extrapulmonary metastases, and (IV) the pulmonary lesion(s) are thought to be completely resectable. In addition to the general eligibility criteria of PM, prognostic factors of each tumor type should be considered when deciding the indication for PM. When patients have multiple poor prognostic factors and/or a short disease-free interval (DFI), thoracic surgeons should not hesitate to observe the patient for a certain period before deciding on the indication for PM. A multidisciplinary discussion is needed in order to decide the indication for PM.

Indexed as

indicationprognostic factorPulmonary metastasectomy (PM)radiological examinations

Identifiers

PMID34012607
PMCPMC8107542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.