ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2021
The impact of an N1 lymph node examination in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe examination of lymph nodes (LNs) is critical for accurate node staging in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but a consensus on the examinations of hilar and intrapulmonary (N1 station) LNs has not been reached. This study aimed to evaluate the role of LN dissection and pathological examination of N1 LN stations and their effects on survival in patients with stage IA-IIA NSCLC.
methodsData from patients pathologically staged as IA-IIA who underwent radical surgery and confirmed as lacking LN metastases from January 2008 to March 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). After propensity score matching (PSM), a Cox model was used to determine the prognostic factors.
resultsOf the 1,935 patients investigated, the median number of N1 stations examined was 3. Patients with at least 2 N1 stations examined had apparently better OS (P=0.002) and DFS (P=0.001). All patients were divided into patients with 0-1 N1 station examined and patients with 2-5 N1 stations examined. After PSM, the number of N1 stations examined was an independent prognostic factor for DFS (P=0.004). Patients with 2-5 N1 stations examined experienced prolonged DFS (P=0.010). Patients in group 12 experienced prolonged OS (P=0.021) and DFS (P=0.026). Patients in group 13 or 14 experienced prolonged OS (P=0.028).
conclusionsA larger extent of N1 station examination was associated with prolonged DFS in patients with stage IA-IIA NSCLC after lobectomy. The dissection and examination of at least 2 N1 stations included LNs from the lobar and segmental drainage fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.