Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34012506›Full record

ArticleProceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging2020

TEMPORALLY ADAPTIVE-DYNAMIC SPARSE NETWORK FOR MODELING DISEASE PROGRESSION.

Jie Zhang, Yalin Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jie ZhangSchool of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Yalin WangSchool of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.

Funding

Training U54EB020403 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI THOMPSON, PAUL M · 2014 to 2018
$10.1M
Multi-Source Sparse Learning to Identify MCI and Predict DeclineRF1AG051710 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI THOMPSON, PAUL M, WANG, YALIN · 2016 to 2016
$2.8M
Predicting the early childhood outcomes of preterm brain shape abnormalitiesR01EB025032 · NIBIB · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES · PI LEPORE, NATASHA · 2017 to 2020
$2.6M
NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG051710NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB025032NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB020403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder with progressive impairment of memory and cognitive functions. Sparse coding (SC) has been demonstrated to be an efficient and effective method for AD diagnosis and prognosis. However, previous SC methods usually focus on the baseline data while ignoring the consistent longitudinal features with strong sparsity pattern along the disease progression. Additionally, SC methods extract sparse features from image patches separately rather than learn with the dictionary atoms across the entire subject. To address these two concerns and comprehensively capture temporal-subject sparse features towards earlier and better discriminability of AD, we propose a novel supervised SC network termed Temporally Adaptive-Dynamic Sparse Network (TADsNet) to uncover the sequential correlation and native subject-level codes from the longitudinal brain images. Our work adaptively updates the sparse codes to impose the temporal regularized correlation and dynamically mine the dictionary atoms to make use of entire subject-level features. Experimental results on ADNI-I cohort validate the superiority of our approach.

Indexed as

LongitudinalRNNSparse Coding

Identifiers

PMID34012506
PMCPMC8130893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.