ArticleJournal of manufacturing processes2021
Simulation assisted design for microneedle manufacturing: Computational modeling of two-photon templated electrodeposition.
Article in Journal of manufacturing processes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Smart drug delivery and responsive microneedles for wound healing.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- Pyrolyzed Ultrasharp Glassy Carbon Microneedles.Advanced engineering materials · 2022Article
- Impact of Systemic versus Intratympanic Dexamethasone Administration on the Perilymph Proteome.Journal of proteome research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Fully metallic micrometer-scale 3D architectures can be fabricated via a hybrid additive methodology combining multi-photon lithography with electrochemical deposition of metals. The methodology - referred to as two-photon templated electrodeposition (2PTE) - has significant design freedom that enables the creation of complicated, traditionally difficult-to-make, high aspect ratio metallic structures such as microneedles. These complicated geometries, combined with their fully metallic nature, can enable precision surgical applications such as inner ear drug delivery or fluid sampling. However, the process involves electrochemical deposition of metals into complicated 3D lithography patterns thicker than 500 μm. This causes potential and chemical gradients to develop within the 3D template, creating limitations to what can be designed. These limitations can be explored, understood, and overcome via numerical modeling. Herein we introduce a numerical model as a design tool that can predict growth for manufacturing complicated 3D metallic geometries. The model is successful in predicting the geometric result of 2PTE, and enables extraction of insights about geometric constraints through exploration of its mechanics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.