Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34012290›Full record

ReviewLocal and regional anesthesia2021

Ultrasound-Guided Local Anesthetic Infiltration Between the Popliteal Artery and the Capsule of the Posterior Knee (IPACK) Block for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Ryan S D'Souza, Brendan J Langford, David A Olsen, Rebecca L Johnson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Local and regional anesthesia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05963139 (Comparison of Local Anesthetic Dose in IPACK), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05963139 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Local Anesthetic Dose in IPACK (Interspace Between the Popliteal Artery and the Posterior Capsule of the Knee) Block Performed for Postoperative Analgesia in Knee Artroplasty Operations

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstanbul UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled112ConditionsAnalgesia, Pain, Postoperative, AnesthesiaArmsBupivacaine, Morphine Sulfate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ryan S D'SouzaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Rochester, MN, USA.
Brendan J LangfordDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Rochester, MN, USA.
David A OlsenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Rochester, MN, USA.
Rebecca L JohnsonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mayo Clinic Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Posterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is common despite multimodal analgesia and regional anesthesia use. This review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing analgesic outcomes after inclusion of local anesthetic infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (iPACK) block versus pathways without iPACK. Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus) were searched from inception to 10/11/2020. Eligible studies evaluated iPACK use on primary outcomes: opioid consumption and pain scores with movement. Secondary outcomes included rest pain, patient satisfaction, length of stay (LOS), gait distance, knee range of motion (ROM), and complications. Bias and quality were appraised using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) guidelines. Eight RCTs (777 patients) were included. iPACK block use demonstrated similar opioid consumption in the PACU (4/7 RCTs) and 24 hours after TKA (5/7 RCTs) compared to without iPACK (moderate-quality GRADE evidence). Additionally, iPACK block use demonstrated lower movement pain scores in PACU (3/5 RCTs) but similar or higher pain scores after 24 hours (5/7 RCTs; low-quality GRADE evidence). Studies consistently reported no difference in gait distance (4/4 RCTs) or complications (7/7 RCTs) between treatment arms (high-quality GRADE evidence), although differing effect estimates were observed with resting pain, satisfaction, LOS, and knee ROM. This review provides a foundation of knowledge on iPACK efficacy. While evidence does not currently support widespread inclusion of iPACK within enhanced recovery pathways for TKA, limitations suggest further study is warranted.

Indexed as

analgesiameta-analysispainregional anesthesiasystematic reviewtotal knee arthroplastytreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID34012290
PMCPMC8126972
OpenAlexW3161262767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.