Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34012227›Full record

ArticleMolecular vision2021

Quantification of a panel for dry-eye protein biomarkers in tears: A comparative pilot study using standard ELISA and customized microarrays.

José Manuel Benitez-Del-Castillo, Javier Soria, Arantxa Acera, Ana María Muñoz, Sandra Rodríguez, Tatiana Suárez

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular vision, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ocular tear fluid biomarkers collected by contact lenses.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. S100A6 Protein-Expression and Function in Norm and Pathology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Enzyme Therapy: Current Challenges and Future Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

José Manuel Benitez-Del-CastilloInstituto de Investigaciones Oftalmológicas Ramón Castroviejo, Facultad de Medicina. Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Javier SoriaBioftalmik Applied Research. Bizkaia Science and Technology Park, Bizkaia, Spain.
Arantxa AceraBioftalmik Applied Research. Bizkaia Science and Technology Park, Bizkaia, Spain.
Ana María MuñozOphthalmology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Sandra RodríguezBioftalmik Applied Research. Bizkaia Science and Technology Park, Bizkaia, Spain.
Tatiana SuárezBioftalmik Applied Research. Bizkaia Science and Technology Park, Bizkaia, Spain.
Hospital Clínico San Carlos · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This paper examines the tear concentration of cystatin S (CST4), calcyclin (S100A6), calgranulin A (S100A8), and matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9), and the correlation between biomarker expression, clinical parameters, and disease severity in patients suffering from dry eye (DE). A comparison of the results is obtained via ELISA tests and customized antibody microarrays for protein quantification. Methods: This single-center, observational study recruited 59 participants (45 DE and 14 controls). Clinical evaluation included an Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, a tear osmolarity (OSM) test, the Schirmer test (SCH), tear breakup time (TBUT), fluorescein (FLUO) and lissamine green (LG) corneal staining, and meibomian gland evaluation (MGE). Tear concentrations of CST4, S100A6, S100A8, and MMP9 were measured using standard individual ELISA assays. The levels of CST4, S100A6, and MMP9 were also measured using customized multiplexed antibody microarrays. Correlations between variables were evaluated, and a significance level was p value <0.05. Results: The quantification of tear protein biomarkers with ELISA showed that the concentration of CST4 was significantly (2.14-fold) reduced in tears of DE patients in comparison with control (CT) subjects (p < 0.001). S100A6 and S100A8 concentrations were significantly higher in the tears of DE patients (1.36- and 2.29-fold; p < 0.001 and 0.025, respectively) in comparison with CT. The MMP9 level was also higher in DE patients (5.83-fold), but not significantly (p = 0.22). The changes in CST4 and S100A6 concentrations were significantly correlated with dry eye disease (DED) severity. Quantification of CST4, S100A6, and MMP9, using antibody microarrays, confirmed the ELISA results. Similar trends were observed: 1.83-fold reduction for CST4 (p value 0.01), 8.63-fold increase for S100A6 (p value <0.001) and 9.67-fold increase for MMP9 (p value 0.94), but with higher sensitivity. The biomarker concentrations were significantly associated with the signs and symptoms related with DED. Conclusions: S100A6, S100A8, and CST4 diagnostic biomarkers strongly correlate with DED clinical parameters. S100A6 and CST4 are also useful for grading DE severity. The multiplexed antibody microarray technique, used here for tear multi-marker quantification, appears more sensitive than standard ELISA tests.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkersCalgranulin ACase-Control StudiesDry Eye SyndromesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayEye ProteinsFemaleHumansMaleMatrix Metalloproteinase 9Microarray AnalysisMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesBiomarkersCalgranulin AEye ProteinsMatrix Metalloproteinase 9MMP9 protein, humanS100 Calcium Binding Protein A6Salivary Cystatinstear proteins

Identifiers

PMID34012227
PMCPMC8116255
OpenAlexW3161473741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.