Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34012206›Full record

ArticleActa informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH2021

University Students Perception of Online Education: Is Engagement Enough?

Apostolos Fyllos, Asimakis Kanellopoulos, Pavlos Kitixis, Daniel-Valentin Cojocari, Alexandra Markou, Vasileios Raoulis, Nikolaos Strimpakos, Aristeidis Zibis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Apostolos FyllosDepartment of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Lamia, Greece.
Asimakis KanellopoulosDepartment of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Lamia, Greece.
Pavlos KitixisDepartment of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Lamia, Greece.
Daniel-Valentin CojocariDepartment of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Lamia, Greece.
Alexandra MarkouDepartment of Anatomy, School of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.
Vasileios RaoulisDepartment of Anatomy, School of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.
Nikolaos StrimpakosDepartment of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Lamia, Greece.
Aristeidis ZibisDepartment of Anatomy, School of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUniversities have halted non-essential services, with many restricting campus-based teaching, and continuing courses through online resources, including (controversially) lab-work. Such technologically enhanced approaches have been proven to have high levels of engagement among university students.

objectiveThis study focuses on the perception of quality of online learning by first-year university students, between two semesters, amidst the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsA 24-item questionnaire was designed with Likert response scale. It consisted of general perception questions of academic life and questions specific to the quality of delivery of a specific class. Eighty one eligible students were asked to fill the same questionnaire for each semester. Students' responses and their grades from the final exams in each semester were compared.

resultsOut of 81 eligible students, 75.31% of students responded to the survey. They were less interested in their studies in the second "online" semester (p=0.05). Students expressed dissatisfaction with the quality of online classes (p=0.03). Academic life fulfillment was also affected (p=0.02). Students' perception of the amount of free time they had between semesters did not change significantly (p=0.16). Students appeared dissatisfied with their active participation during the online class (p=0.007), even though they felt less stressed attending lectures from home (p=0.041). However, they found that workload was bearable and similar between semesters (p=0.83). Students also had significantly more trouble concentrating during online lectures (p<0.001). Students' grades significantly improved by an average of 1.07 (out of 10) in the final exams at the end of the second semester (p<0.001).

conclusionThese unprecedented circumstances require innovation and cooperation on the part of university programs to maintain rigorous standards of higher education, taking into account students' evolving perception and needs.

Indexed as

COVID-19online learninguniversity

Identifiers

PMID34012206
PMCPMC8116092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.